PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBIL vs. BOEG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBIL vs. BOEG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF (BOEG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBIL achieves a 462.18% return, which is significantly higher than BOEG's -14.18% return.


NBIL

1D
-7.17%
1M
83.16%
YTD
462.18%
6M
280.16%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BOEG

1D
-6.30%
1M
-11.15%
YTD
-14.18%
6M
-2.43%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBIL vs. BOEG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NBIL
GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF
462.18%-59.19%
BOEG
Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF
-14.18%-9.57%

Correlation

The correlation between NBIL and BOEG is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBIL vs. BOEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF (BOEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NBIL vs. BOEG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBILBOEGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.30

-0.14

+1.43

Drawdowns

NBIL vs. BOEG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBIL drawdown since its inception was -77.87%, which is greater than BOEG's maximum drawdown of -46.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIL and BOEG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBILBOEGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.87%

-46.47%

-31.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.98%

-35.57%

+25.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.90%

-19.06%

-25.84%

Volatility

NBIL vs. BOEG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBILBOEGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

199.38%

63.38%

+136.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

199.38%

63.38%

+136.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

199.38%

63.38%

+136.00%

NBIL vs. BOEG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBIL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BOEG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBIL vs. BOEG - Dividend Comparison

Neither NBIL nor BOEG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NBIL and BOEG have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BOEG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BOEG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NBIL.

NBIL and BOEG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for NBIL and 0.75% for BOEG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBIL and BOEG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer