NBIL vs. AMDG
NBIL (GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) and AMDG (Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NBIL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AMDG.
Performance
NBIL vs. AMDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBIL achieves a 462.18% return, which is significantly higher than AMDG's 391.03% return.
NBIL
- 1D
- -7.17%
- 1M
- 83.16%
- YTD
- 462.18%
- 6M
- 280.16%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMDG
- 1D
- 7.70%
- 1M
- 134.89%
- YTD
- 391.03%
- 6M
- 367.32%
- 1Y
- 1,172.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NBIL vs. AMDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NBIL GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 462.18% | -59.19% |
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF | 391.03% | -8.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBIL and AMDG is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBIL vs. AMDG — Risk / Return Rank
NBIL
AMDG
NBIL vs. AMDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NBIL | AMDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 9.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.30 | 3.36 | -2.07 |
Drawdowns
NBIL vs. AMDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBIL drawdown since its inception was -77.87%, which is greater than AMDG's maximum drawdown of -63.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIL and AMDG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBIL | AMDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.87% | -63.04% | -14.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -56.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.98% | 0.00% | -9.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.90% | -25.70% | -19.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 28.80% | — |
Volatility
NBIL vs. AMDG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBIL | AMDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 45.35% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 94.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 199.38% | 129.64% | +69.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 199.38% | 130.26% | +69.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 199.38% | 130.26% | +69.12% |
NBIL vs. AMDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBIL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
NBIL vs. AMDG - Dividend Comparison
NBIL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF | 2.28% | 11.21% |
NBIL GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NBIL and AMDG have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NBIL.
AMDG has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 0.00% for NBIL.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for NBIL and 0.75% for AMDG.
Find the right allocation for NBIL and AMDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer