NBIIX vs. FSGEX
Compare and contrast key facts about Neuberger Berman International Equity Fund (NBIIX) and Fidelity Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGEX).
NBIIX is managed by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Jun 16, 2005. FSGEX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 29, 2009.
Performance
NBIIX vs. FSGEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NBIIX vs. FSGEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBIIX Neuberger Berman International Equity Fund | -6.74% | 13.56% | 5.34% | 14.28% | -22.00% | 13.85% | 13.89% | 27.89% | -16.45% | 27.16% |
FSGEX Fidelity Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund | -1.20% | 32.99% | 5.34% | 15.56% | -15.75% | 7.77% | 10.75% | 21.41% | -13.99% | 27.47% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBIIX achieves a -6.74% return, which is significantly lower than FSGEX's -1.20% return. Over the past 10 years, NBIIX has underperformed FSGEX with an annualized return of 5.79%, while FSGEX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.55% annualized return.
NBIIX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -13.32%
- YTD
- -6.74%
- 6M
- -10.33%
- 1Y
- -0.00%
- 3Y*
- 6.02%
- 5Y*
- 2.16%
- 10Y*
- 5.79%
FSGEX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -11.07%
- YTD
- -1.20%
- 6M
- 3.57%
- 1Y
- 23.80%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 6.98%
- 10Y*
- 8.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NBIIX vs. FSGEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBIIX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than FSGEX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NBIIX vs. FSGEX — Risk / Return Rank
NBIIX
FSGEX
NBIIX vs. FSGEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman International Equity Fund (NBIIX) and Fidelity Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NBIIX | FSGEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | 1.43 | -1.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.05 | 1.93 | -1.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.29 | -0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 1.89 | -2.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.72 | 7.46 | -8.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NBIIX | FSGEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 | 1.43 | -1.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.46 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.53 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.36 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between NBIIX and FSGEX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NBIIX vs. FSGEX - Dividend Comparison
NBIIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSGEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBIIX Neuberger Berman International Equity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.56% | 2.54% | 5.40% | 11.99% | 4.84% | 2.72% | 1.43% | 0.95% | 1.44% | 1.28% |
FSGEX Fidelity Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund | 3.06% | 3.02% | 2.98% | 2.90% | 2.78% | 2.59% | 1.68% | 2.10% | 2.86% | 2.48% | 2.56% | 2.61% |
Drawdowns
NBIIX vs. FSGEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBIIX drawdown since its inception was -61.08%, which is greater than FSGEX's maximum drawdown of -34.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIIX and FSGEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBIIX | FSGEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.08% | -34.74% | -26.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.36% | -11.24% | -3.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.20% | -29.66% | -5.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.20% | -34.74% | -0.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.10% | -11.24% | -2.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.19% | -8.51% | -4.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.35% | 2.86% | +1.49% |
Volatility
NBIIX vs. FSGEX - Volatility Comparison
Neuberger Berman International Equity Fund (NBIIX) and Fidelity Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGEX) have volatilities of 7.08% and 7.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NBIIX | FSGEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.08% | 7.21% | -0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.80% | 10.85% | +3.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.92% | 16.09% | +3.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.28% | 15.14% | +2.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.13% | 16.12% | +1.01% |