NBIG vs. QTAP
Compare and contrast key facts about Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP).
NBIG and QTAP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NBIG is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Oct 27, 2025. QTAP is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Apr 1, 2021.
Performance
NBIG vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NBIG vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 9.01% | -62.34% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 3.02% | 1.29% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBIG achieves a 9.01% return, which is significantly higher than QTAP's 3.02% return.
NBIG
- 1D
- -3.97%
- 1M
- 10.38%
- YTD
- 9.01%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTAP
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 3.02%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 21.08%
- 3Y*
- 19.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NBIG vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBIG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NBIG vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank
NBIG
QTAP
NBIG vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NBIG | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.44 | 0.64 | -1.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between NBIG and QTAP is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
NBIG vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison
Neither NBIG nor QTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
NBIG vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBIG drawdown since its inception was -75.83%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIG and QTAP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBIG | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.83% | -29.44% | -46.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.63% | 0.00% | -62.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.63% | -5.21% | -48.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.68% | — |
Volatility
NBIG vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NBIG | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.88% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.23% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 198.26% | 16.38% | +181.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 198.26% | 19.03% | +179.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 198.26% | 19.03% | +179.23% |