PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBIG vs. QCMU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBIG vs. QCMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG) and Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X Shares (QCMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBIG achieves a 453.13% return, which is significantly higher than QCMU's 77.81% return.


NBIG

1D
-6.73%
1M
83.04%
YTD
453.13%
6M
273.38%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QCMU

1D
7.67%
1M
101.14%
YTD
77.81%
6M
69.89%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBIG vs. QCMU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NBIG
Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF
453.13%-62.34%
QCMU
Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X Shares
77.81%-19.12%

Correlation

The correlation between NBIG and QCMU is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025

0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBIG vs. QCMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG) and Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X Shares (QCMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NBIG vs. QCMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBIGQCMUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

1.09

+0.12

Drawdowns

NBIG vs. QCMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBIG drawdown since its inception was -75.83%, which is greater than QCMU's maximum drawdown of -59.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIG and QCMU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBIGQCMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.83%

-59.48%

-16.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.57%

-2.41%

-7.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.08%

-22.61%

-20.47%

Volatility

NBIG vs. QCMU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBIGQCMUDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

201.21%

96.20%

+105.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

201.21%

96.20%

+105.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

201.21%

96.20%

+105.01%

NBIG vs. QCMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBIG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than QCMU's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBIG vs. QCMU - Dividend Comparison

NBIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QCMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NBIG and QCMU have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NBIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NBIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for QCMU.

QCMU has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.00% for NBIG.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NBIG and 1.07% for QCMU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBIG and QCMU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer