PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBIE vs. UMMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBIE vs. UMMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger International Core Equity ETF (NBIE) and Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NBIE

1D
0.85%
1M
3.64%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UMMA

1D
-0.13%
1M
12.11%
YTD
32.32%
6M
35.20%
1Y
51.77%
3Y*
22.81%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBIE vs. UMMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NBIE and UMMA is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2026

0.86

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBIE vs. UMMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBIE

UMMA
UMMA Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
UMMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMMA Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
UMMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMMA Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBIE vs. UMMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger International Core Equity ETF (NBIE) and Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NBIE vs. UMMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBIEUMMADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.30

0.58

+0.72

Drawdowns

NBIE vs. UMMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBIE drawdown since its inception was -5.76%, smaller than the maximum UMMA drawdown of -34.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIE and UMMA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBIEUMMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.76%

-34.17%

+28.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.90%

+0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.59%

-9.81%

+8.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.82%

Volatility

NBIE vs. UMMA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBIEUMMADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.72%

20.11%

-0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.72%

20.55%

-0.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.72%

20.55%

-0.83%

NBIE vs. UMMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBIE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than UMMA's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBIE vs. UMMA - Dividend Comparison

NBIE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UMMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
NBIE
Neuberger International Core Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UMMA
Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF
0.93%1.02%0.91%1.09%1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


NBIE and UMMA have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NBIE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NBIE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for UMMA.

UMMA has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.00% for NBIE.

They also come from different issuers: Neuberger and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for NBIE and 0.65% for UMMA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBIE and UMMA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer