NBIE vs. UMMA

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

NBIE (Neuberger International Core Equity ETF) and UMMA (Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NBIE charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for UMMA.

Performance

NBIE vs. UMMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger International Core Equity ETF (NBIE) and Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NBIE

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: -0.05%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UMMA

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: 5.16%
• YTD: 30.40%
• 6M: 30.71%
• 1Y: 49.17%
• 3Y*: 22.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBIE vs. UMMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
NBIE Neuberger International Core Equity ETF	5.95%
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF	22.41%

Correlation

The correlation between NBIE and UMMA is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2026	0.83

Return for Risk

NBIE vs. UMMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBIE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

UMMA

UMMA Risk / Return Rank: 73
UMMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
UMMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
UMMA Omega Ratio Rank: 74
UMMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
UMMA Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBIE vs. UMMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger International Core Equity ETF (NBIE) and Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NBIE	UMMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.18	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.81	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.39	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.31	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	12.63	—

Drawdowns

NBIE vs. UMMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBIE drawdown since its inception was -5.76%, smaller than the maximum UMMA drawdown of -34.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIE and UMMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	NBIE	UMMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.76%	-34.17%	+28.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.93%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.63%	-4.42%	+1.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.50%	-9.73%	+8.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.90%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NBIE	UMMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	12.07%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	20.30%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.84%	22.74%	-2.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.84%	21.08%	-1.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.84%	21.08%	-1.24%

NBIE vs. UMMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBIE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than UMMA's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

NBIE vs. UMMA - Dividend Comparison

NBIE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UMMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
NBIE Neuberger International Core Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF	0.94%	1.02%	0.91%	1.09%	1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NBIE and UMMA in my portfolio?

NBIE and UMMA have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NBIE or UMMA?

On fees, NBIE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NBIE or UMMA?

NBIE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for UMMA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NBIE or UMMA?

UMMA has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.00% for NBIE.

What is the main difference between NBIE and UMMA?

They also come from different issuers: Neuberger and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for NBIE and 0.65% for UMMA.