NBHC vs. KRE
NBHC (National Bank Holdings Corporation) is a stock, while KRE (SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF) is Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P Regional Banks Select Industry Index. Over the past 10 years, NBHC returned 9.53%/yr vs 8.06%/yr for KRE. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
NBHC vs. KRE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBHC achieves a 11.87% return, which is significantly higher than KRE's 7.92% return. Over the past 10 years, NBHC has outperformed KRE with an annualized return of 9.53%, while KRE has yielded a comparatively lower 8.06% annualized return.
NBHC
- 1D
- 1.63%
- 1M
- -2.04%
- YTD
- 11.87%
- 6M
- 13.37%
- 1Y
- 20.15%
- 3Y*
- 11.50%
- 5Y*
- 3.80%
- 10Y*
- 9.53%
KRE
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- YTD
- 7.92%
- 6M
- 11.14%
- 1Y
- 26.29%
- 3Y*
- 21.60%
- 5Y*
- 2.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.06%
NBHC vs. KRE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBHC National Bank Holdings Corporation | 11.87% | -8.94% | 19.11% | -8.81% | -2.16% | 37.06% | -4.50% | 16.56% | -3.44% | 2.77% |
KRE SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF | 7.92% | 10.21% | 18.58% | -7.61% | -15.08% | 39.29% | -7.43% | 27.44% | -18.81% | 7.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBHC and KRE is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2012 | 0.76 |
The correlation between NBHC and KRE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBHC vs. KRE — Risk / Return Rank
NBHC
KRE
NBHC vs. KRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for National Bank Holdings Corporation (NBHC) and SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NBHC | KRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.79 | 1.14 | -0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.27 | 1.65 | -0.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.22 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 1.70 | -0.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.06 | 4.42 | -1.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NBHC | KRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 1.14 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.08 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.25 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.13 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
NBHC vs. KRE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBHC drawdown since its inception was -48.43%, smaller than the maximum KRE drawdown of -68.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBHC and KRE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBHC | KRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.43% | -68.54% | +20.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.41% | -14.95% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.94% | -28.20% | -4.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.64% | -52.69% | +9.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.43% | -54.92% | +6.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.88% | -5.01% | -8.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.33% | -21.91% | +8.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.37% | 5.74% | +0.63% |
Volatility
NBHC vs. KRE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for National Bank Holdings Corporation (NBHC) is 5.26%, while SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE) has a volatility of 5.76%. This indicates that NBHC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBHC | KRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 5.76% | -0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.33% | 15.67% | +0.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.74% | 23.25% | +2.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.67% | 29.96% | +0.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.37% | 31.92% | -0.55% |
Dividends
NBHC vs. KRE - Dividend Comparison
NBHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, more than KRE's 2.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRE SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.59% | 2.99% | 2.51% | 1.97% | 2.78% | 2.21% | 2.48% | 1.40% | 1.40% | 1.80% |
NBHC National Bank Holdings Corporation | 2.99% | 3.16% | 2.60% | 2.80% | 2.23% | 1.98% | 2.44% | 2.13% | 1.75% | 1.05% | 0.69% | 0.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NBHC and KRE have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KRE has higher volatility (5.76%) compared to NBHC (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBHC dropped -48.43% vs KRE's -68.54%.
KRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NBHC and KRE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer