PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBHC vs. KRE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBHC vs. KRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in National Bank Holdings Corporation (NBHC) and SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBHC achieves a 11.87% return, which is significantly higher than KRE's 7.92% return. Over the past 10 years, NBHC has outperformed KRE with an annualized return of 9.53%, while KRE has yielded a comparatively lower 8.06% annualized return.


NBHC

1D
1.63%
1M
-2.04%
YTD
11.87%
6M
13.37%
1Y
20.15%
3Y*
11.50%
5Y*
3.80%
10Y*
9.53%

KRE

1D
1.80%
1M
-0.40%
YTD
7.92%
6M
11.14%
1Y
26.29%
3Y*
21.60%
5Y*
2.38%
10Y*
8.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBHC vs. KRE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NBHC
National Bank Holdings Corporation
11.87%-8.94%19.11%-8.81%-2.16%37.06%-4.50%16.56%-3.44%2.77%
KRE
SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF
7.92%10.21%18.58%-7.61%-15.08%39.29%-7.43%27.44%-18.81%7.49%

Correlation

The correlation between NBHC and KRE is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2012

0.76

The correlation between NBHC and KRE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBHC vs. KRE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBHC
NBHC Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
NBHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBHC Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
NBHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBHC Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

KRE
KRE Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
KRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
KRE Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
KRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
KRE Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBHC vs. KRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for National Bank Holdings Corporation (NBHC) and SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NBHCKREDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.79

1.14

-0.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.27

1.65

-0.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.22

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

1.70

-0.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.06

4.42

-1.36

NBHC vs. KRE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBHC Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the KRE Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBHC and KRE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBHCKREDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

1.14

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.08

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.25

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.13

+0.14

Drawdowns

NBHC vs. KRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBHC drawdown since its inception was -48.43%, smaller than the maximum KRE drawdown of -68.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBHC and KRE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBHCKREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.43%

-68.54%

+20.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.41%

-14.95%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.94%

-28.20%

-4.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.64%

-52.69%

+9.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.43%

-54.92%

+6.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.88%

-5.01%

-8.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.33%

-21.91%

+8.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.37%

5.74%

+0.63%

Volatility

NBHC vs. KRE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for National Bank Holdings Corporation (NBHC) is 5.26%, while SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE) has a volatility of 5.76%. This indicates that NBHC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBHCKREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

5.76%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.33%

15.67%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.74%

23.25%

+2.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.67%

29.96%

+0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.37%

31.92%

-0.55%

Dividends

NBHC vs. KRE - Dividend Comparison

NBHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, more than KRE's 2.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KRE
SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF
2.26%2.45%2.59%2.99%2.51%1.97%2.78%2.21%2.48%1.40%1.40%1.80%
NBHC
National Bank Holdings Corporation
2.99%3.16%2.60%2.80%2.23%1.98%2.44%2.13%1.75%1.05%0.69%0.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


NBHC and KRE have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KRE has higher volatility (5.76%) compared to NBHC (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBHC dropped -48.43% vs KRE's -68.54%.

KRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBHC and KRE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer