NBGX vs. QLC
NBGX (Neuberger Growth ETF) and QLC (FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - NBGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Neuberger, while QLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index. NBGX is actively managed, while QLC is passively managed. Over the past year, NBGX returned 19.09% vs 33.91% for QLC. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NBGX charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for QLC.
Performance
NBGX vs. QLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBGX achieves a 6.18% return, which is significantly lower than QLC's 12.12% return.
NBGX
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 3.51%
- YTD
- 6.18%
- 6M
- 5.66%
- 1Y
- 19.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QLC
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 5.15%
- YTD
- 12.12%
- 6M
- 12.40%
- 1Y
- 33.91%
- 3Y*
- 25.73%
- 5Y*
- 15.44%
- 10Y*
- 14.84%
NBGX vs. QLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NBGX Neuberger Growth ETF | 6.18% | 16.40% | -0.53% |
QLC FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund | 12.12% | 23.26% | 0.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBGX and QLC is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2024 | 0.91 |
The correlation between NBGX and QLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBGX vs. QLC — Risk / Return Rank
NBGX
QLC
NBGX vs. QLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Growth ETF (NBGX) and FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NBGX | QLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.49 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 3.85 | -2.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.44 | 18.03 | -13.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NBGX | QLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 2.75 | -1.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.80 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
NBGX vs. QLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBGX drawdown since its inception was -21.55%, smaller than the maximum QLC drawdown of -35.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBGX and QLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBGX | QLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.55% | -35.86% | +14.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.86% | -8.84% | -6.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -0.09% | -0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.92% | -4.54% | +0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.31% | 1.89% | +2.42% |
Volatility
NBGX vs. QLC - Volatility Comparison
Neuberger Growth ETF (NBGX) has a higher volatility of 3.12% compared to FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC) at 2.89%. This indicates that NBGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBGX | QLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 2.89% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.73% | 9.52% | +1.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.15% | 12.38% | +1.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.96% | 16.82% | +3.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.96% | 18.42% | +1.54% |
NBGX vs. QLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBGX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than QLC's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
NBGX vs. QLC - Dividend Comparison
NBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than QLC's 0.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBGX Neuberger Growth ETF | 0.39% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QLC FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund | 0.87% | 0.94% | 1.03% | 1.26% | 1.46% | 0.96% | 1.40% | 1.91% | 1.82% | 1.29% | 1.80% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NBGX and QLC have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NBGX has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to QLC (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBGX dropped -21.55% vs QLC's -35.86%.
On 1-year performance, QLC leads with 33.91% vs 19.09% for NBGX. On fees, QLC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, QLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QLC has performed better with a 33.91% return vs 19.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QLC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for NBGX.
QLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.39% for NBGX.
NBGX is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Neuberger and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for NBGX and 0.25% for QLC.
QLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NBGX and QLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer