NBGX vs. HYP

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NBGX (Neuberger Growth ETF) and HYP (Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NBGX charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for HYP.

Performance

NBGX vs. HYP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Growth ETF (NBGX) and Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF (HYP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBGX achieves a 6.18% return, which is significantly lower than HYP's 32.89% return.

NBGX

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 3.51%
• YTD: 6.18%
• 6M: 5.66%
• 1Y: 19.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HYP

• 1D: 1.19%
• 1M: 6.48%
• YTD: 32.89%
• 6M: 28.18%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBGX vs. HYP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NBGX Neuberger Growth ETF	6.18%	0.59%
HYP Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF	32.89%	-5.01%

Correlation

The correlation between NBGX and HYP is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025	0.61

Return for Risk

NBGX vs. HYP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBGX

NBGX Risk / Return Rank: 34
NBGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
NBGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
NBGX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
NBGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
NBGX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBGX vs. HYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Growth ETF (NBGX) and Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF (HYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NBGX	HYP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.92	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.29	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.44	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NBGX	HYP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.36	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	0.98	-0.20

Drawdowns

NBGX vs. HYP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBGX drawdown since its inception was -21.55%, which is greater than HYP's maximum drawdown of -19.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBGX and HYP.

Drawdown Indicators

	NBGX	HYP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.55%	-19.58%	-1.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.86%	-1.11%	+0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.92%	-6.42%	+2.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.31%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NBGX	HYP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.12%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.73%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.15%	40.91%	-26.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.96%	40.91%	-20.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.96%	40.91%	-20.95%

NBGX vs. HYP - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBGX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than HYP's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

NBGX vs. HYP - Dividend Comparison

NBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, more than HYP's 0.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
HYP Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF	0.10%	0.14%
NBGX Neuberger Growth ETF	0.39%	0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NBGX and HYP in my portfolio?

NBGX and HYP have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NBGX or HYP?

On fees, NBGX is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NBGX or HYP?

NBGX is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for HYP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NBGX or HYP?

NBGX has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.10% for HYP.

What is the main difference between NBGX and HYP?

They also come from different issuers: Neuberger and Golden Eagle. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for NBGX and 0.85% for HYP.