NBGX vs. AVUS
NBGX (Neuberger Growth ETF) and AVUS (Avantis U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NBGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Neuberger, while AVUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NBGX returned 17.99% vs 32.84% for AVUS. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NBGX charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AVUS.
Performance
NBGX vs. AVUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBGX achieves a 3.93% return, which is significantly lower than AVUS's 14.87% return.
NBGX
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- -1.16%
- YTD
- 3.93%
- 6M
- 4.10%
- 1Y
- 17.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVUS
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.87%
- YTD
- 14.87%
- 6M
- 14.04%
- 1Y
- 32.84%
- 3Y*
- 22.02%
- 5Y*
- 13.28%
- 10Y*
- —
NBGX vs. AVUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NBGX Neuberger Growth ETF | 3.93% | 16.40% | -1.22% |
AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | 14.87% | 16.68% | 0.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBGX and AVUS is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024 | 0.85 |
The correlation between NBGX and AVUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBGX vs. AVUS — Risk / Return Rank
NBGX
AVUS
NBGX vs. AVUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Growth ETF (NBGX) and Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NBGX | AVUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.47 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 4.20 | -2.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.13 | 18.77 | -14.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NBGX vs. AVUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBGX drawdown since its inception was -21.55%, smaller than the maximum AVUS drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBGX and AVUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBGX | AVUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.55% | -37.04% | +15.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.86% | -7.85% | -7.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.96% | -0.51% | -2.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.89% | -5.06% | +1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.37% | 1.75% | +2.62% |
Volatility
NBGX vs. AVUS - Volatility Comparison
Neuberger Growth ETF (NBGX) has a higher volatility of 5.12% compared to Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS) at 4.50%. This indicates that NBGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBGX | AVUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.12% | 4.50% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.51% | 9.72% | +1.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.78% | 12.66% | +2.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.04% | 17.35% | +2.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.04% | 20.83% | -0.79% |
NBGX vs. AVUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBGX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than AVUS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
NBGX vs. AVUS - Dividend Comparison
NBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than AVUS's 1.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | 1.17% | 1.08% | 1.27% | 1.41% | 1.59% | 1.08% | 1.19% | 0.35% |
NBGX Neuberger Growth ETF | 0.39% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NBGX and AVUS have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NBGX has higher volatility (5.12%) compared to AVUS (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBGX dropped -21.55% vs AVUS's -37.04%.
On 1-year performance, AVUS leads with 32.84% vs 17.99% for NBGX. On fees, AVUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AVUS has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AVUS has performed better with a 32.84% return vs 17.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for NBGX.
AVUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.39% for NBGX.
NBGX is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while AVUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Neuberger and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for NBGX and 0.15% for AVUS.
AVUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NBGX and AVUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer