NBGPX vs. SHGTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Capital Allocation Moderate Aggressive Portfolio (NBGPX) and Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund (SHGTX).
NBGPX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Oct 14, 1996. SHGTX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on May 22, 1994.
Performance
NBGPX vs. SHGTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NBGPX vs. SHGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBGPX Columbia Capital Allocation Moderate Aggressive Portfolio | -1.91% | 17.29% | 13.35% | 17.73% | -17.91% | 12.96% | 12.98% | 21.65% | -7.94% | 18.82% |
SHGTX Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund | 4.81% | 35.09% | 26.04% | 45.28% | -31.70% | 38.60% | 45.56% | 54.92% | -8.70% | 34.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBGPX achieves a -1.91% return, which is significantly lower than SHGTX's 4.81% return. Over the past 10 years, NBGPX has underperformed SHGTX with an annualized return of 8.41%, while SHGTX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.68% annualized return.
NBGPX
- 1D
- 2.24%
- 1M
- -4.49%
- YTD
- -1.91%
- 6M
- 0.22%
- 1Y
- 16.11%
- 3Y*
- 13.26%
- 5Y*
- 6.28%
- 10Y*
- 8.41%
SHGTX
- 1D
- 5.55%
- 1M
- -5.32%
- YTD
- 4.81%
- 6M
- 8.30%
- 1Y
- 60.42%
- 3Y*
- 30.37%
- 5Y*
- 16.45%
- 10Y*
- 22.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NBGPX vs. SHGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBGPX has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than SHGTX's 1.29% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NBGPX vs. SHGTX — Risk / Return Rank
NBGPX
SHGTX
NBGPX vs. SHGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Capital Allocation Moderate Aggressive Portfolio (NBGPX) and Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund (SHGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NBGPX | SHGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.36 | 2.02 | -0.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.96 | 2.60 | -0.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.36 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | 4.13 | -2.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.12 | 15.42 | -6.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NBGPX | SHGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 2.02 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.61 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.85 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.60 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between NBGPX and SHGTX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NBGPX vs. SHGTX - Dividend Comparison
NBGPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.00%, which matches SHGTX's 8.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBGPX Columbia Capital Allocation Moderate Aggressive Portfolio | 8.00% | 8.12% | 6.80% | 4.67% | 6.52% | 16.00% | 5.44% | 7.61% | 9.89% | 7.46% | 4.03% | 6.92% |
SHGTX Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund | 8.06% | 8.45% | 14.04% | 6.22% | 3.94% | 11.77% | 9.92% | 10.26% | 12.75% | 7.25% | 8.13% | 8.09% |
Drawdowns
NBGPX vs. SHGTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBGPX drawdown since its inception was -40.41%, smaller than the maximum SHGTX drawdown of -77.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBGPX and SHGTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBGPX | SHGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.41% | -77.47% | +37.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.48% | -14.93% | +6.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.03% | -43.17% | +19.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.76% | -43.17% | +16.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.08% | -7.51% | +2.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.74% | -25.06% | +20.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | 4.00% | -2.18% |
Volatility
NBGPX vs. SHGTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Capital Allocation Moderate Aggressive Portfolio (NBGPX) is 4.66%, while Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund (SHGTX) has a volatility of 11.08%. This indicates that NBGPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NBGPX | SHGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.66% | 11.08% | -6.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.21% | 21.67% | -14.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.16% | 31.05% | -18.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.81% | 27.29% | -15.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.19% | 26.64% | -14.45% |