PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBGPX vs. FYMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NBGPX vs. FYMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Capital Allocation Moderate Aggressive Portfolio (NBGPX) and Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NBGPX vs. FYMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
NBGPX
Columbia Capital Allocation Moderate Aggressive Portfolio
-1.91%17.29%13.35%17.73%-14.75%
FYMIX
Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund
-2.11%18.95%11.09%16.15%-15.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBGPX achieves a -1.91% return, which is significantly higher than FYMIX's -2.11% return.


NBGPX

1D
2.24%
1M
-4.49%
YTD
-1.91%
6M
0.22%
1Y
16.11%
3Y*
13.26%
5Y*
6.28%
10Y*
8.41%

FYMIX

1D
2.39%
1M
-5.31%
YTD
-2.11%
6M
0.46%
1Y
17.23%
3Y*
12.19%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NBGPX vs. FYMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBGPX has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than FYMIX's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

NBGPX vs. FYMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBGPX
NBGPX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
NBGPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBGPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBGPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
NBGPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBGPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

FYMIX
FYMIX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FYMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FYMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBGPX vs. FYMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Capital Allocation Moderate Aggressive Portfolio (NBGPX) and Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NBGPXFYMIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.36

1.33

+0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.96

1.91

+0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.28

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

1.96

-0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.12

7.99

+1.13

NBGPX vs. FYMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBGPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the FYMIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBGPX and FYMIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBGPXFYMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

1.33

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.47

+0.16

Correlation

The correlation between NBGPX and FYMIX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

NBGPX vs. FYMIX - Dividend Comparison

NBGPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.00%, more than FYMIX's 3.77% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBGPX
Columbia Capital Allocation Moderate Aggressive Portfolio
8.00%8.12%6.80%4.67%6.52%16.00%5.44%7.61%9.89%7.46%4.03%6.92%
FYMIX
Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund
3.77%3.69%1.84%1.78%1.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

NBGPX vs. FYMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBGPX drawdown since its inception was -40.41%, which is greater than FYMIX's maximum drawdown of -22.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBGPX and FYMIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NBGPXFYMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.41%

-22.70%

-17.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.48%

-8.95%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.08%

-6.54%

+1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.74%

-5.83%

+1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

2.20%

-0.38%

Volatility

NBGPX vs. FYMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Capital Allocation Moderate Aggressive Portfolio (NBGPX) is 4.66%, while Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX) has a volatility of 5.52%. This indicates that NBGPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FYMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NBGPXFYMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.66%

5.52%

-0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.21%

8.39%

-1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.16%

13.38%

-1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.81%

12.72%

-0.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.19%

12.72%

-0.53%