PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBGIX vs. CMCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NBGIX vs. CMCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class (NBGIX) and Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NBGIX vs. CMCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
NBGIX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class
-1.41%-4.55%9.20%7.52%
CMCIX
Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I
-4.71%-5.28%10.46%7.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBGIX achieves a -1.41% return, which is significantly higher than CMCIX's -4.71% return.


NBGIX

1D
-0.60%
1M
-8.83%
YTD
-1.41%
6M
-3.00%
1Y
2.66%
3Y*
3.57%
5Y*
1.25%
10Y*
8.70%

CMCIX

1D
-0.17%
1M
-8.88%
YTD
-4.71%
6M
-7.29%
1Y
-5.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NBGIX vs. CMCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBGIX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than CMCIX's 1.26% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NBGIX vs. CMCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBGIX
NBGIX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
NBGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
NBGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

CMCIX
CMCIX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
CMCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
CMCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBGIX vs. CMCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class (NBGIX) and Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NBGIXCMCIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.13

-0.29

+0.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.35

-0.30

+0.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

0.96

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.01

-0.54

+0.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.03

-1.39

+1.42

NBGIX vs. CMCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBGIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is higher than the CMCIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBGIX and CMCIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBGIXCMCIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

-0.29

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.18

+0.35

Correlation

The correlation between NBGIX and CMCIX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

NBGIX vs. CMCIX - Dividend Comparison

NBGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.65%, more than CMCIX's 4.46% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBGIX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class
16.65%16.41%2.14%3.13%11.11%10.91%3.87%6.00%12.49%14.10%6.53%11.28%
CMCIX
Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I
4.46%4.25%7.13%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

NBGIX vs. CMCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBGIX drawdown since its inception was -51.62%, which is greater than CMCIX's maximum drawdown of -21.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBGIX and CMCIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NBGIXCMCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.62%

-21.50%

-30.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.26%

-12.55%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.90%

-16.43%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.46%

-6.16%

-1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.20%

4.90%

-0.70%

Volatility

NBGIX vs. CMCIX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class (NBGIX) and Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX) have volatilities of 4.90% and 4.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NBGIXCMCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.90%

4.68%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.36%

10.54%

+0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.75%

19.19%

+1.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.66%

16.61%

+3.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.19%

16.61%

+3.58%