NBFR vs. UXJL
NBFR (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed 10 Buffer ETF) and UXJL (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NBFR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for UXJL.
Performance
NBFR vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NBFR
- 1D
- -4.05%
- 1M
- 0.92%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UXJL
- 1D
- -3.02%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 8.90%
- 6M
- 8.35%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NBFR vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NBFR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed 10 Buffer ETF | 3.19% |
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July | 8.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBFR and UXJL is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2026 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBFR vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed 10 Buffer ETF (NBFR) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NBFR | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 1.55 | -0.64 |
Drawdowns
NBFR vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBFR drawdown since its inception was -5.68%, smaller than the maximum UXJL drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBFR and UXJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBFR | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.68% | -10.29% | +4.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.55% | -3.32% | -1.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.33% | -1.51% | +0.18% |
Volatility
NBFR vs. UXJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBFR | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.14% | 14.24% | -1.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.14% | 14.24% | -1.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.14% | 14.24% | -1.10% |
NBFR vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBFR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than UXJL's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
NBFR vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison
NBFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, while UXJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
NBFR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed 10 Buffer ETF | 0.02% |
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NBFR and UXJL have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NBFR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NBFR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJL.
NBFR has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for UXJL.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NBFR and 0.85% for UXJL.
Find the right allocation for NBFR and UXJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer