NBFR vs. FFTY

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

NBFR (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed 10 Buffer ETF) and FFTY (Innovator IBD 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NBFR is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while FFTY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the IBD 50 Index. NBFR is actively managed, while FFTY is passively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NBFR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFTY.

Performance

NBFR vs. FFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed 10 Buffer ETF (NBFR) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NBFR

• 1D: -4.05%
• 1M: 0.92%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FFTY

• 1D: -7.47%
• 1M: -5.12%
• YTD: 12.41%
• 6M: 12.46%
• 1Y: 30.31%
• 3Y*: 18.01%
• 5Y*: -1.91%
• 10Y*: 6.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBFR vs. FFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
NBFR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed 10 Buffer ETF	3.19%
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF	-3.22%

Correlation

The correlation between NBFR and FFTY is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2026	0.72

Return for Risk

NBFR vs. FFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFTY

FFTY Risk / Return Rank: 26
FFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
FFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
FFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 26
FFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
FFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBFR vs. FFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed 10 Buffer ETF (NBFR) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NBFR	FFTY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.07	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.25	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.90	0.17	+0.73

Drawdowns

NBFR vs. FFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBFR drawdown since its inception was -5.68%, smaller than the maximum FFTY drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBFR and FFTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	NBFR	FFTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.68%	-59.46%	+53.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-23.29%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.60%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-59.46%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-59.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.55%	-20.77%	+16.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.33%	-22.37%	+21.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	8.78%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NBFR	FFTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	11.61%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	27.32%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.14%	34.94%	-21.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.14%	29.32%	-16.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.14%	27.51%	-14.37%

NBFR vs. FFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBFR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

NBFR vs. FFTY - Dividend Comparison

NBFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than FFTY's 1.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF	1.20%	1.35%	0.91%	0.65%	2.75%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.17%
NBFR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed 10 Buffer ETF	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NBFR and FFTY in my portfolio?

NBFR and FFTY have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NBFR or FFTY?

On fees, NBFR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NBFR or FFTY?

NBFR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NBFR or FFTY?

FFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.02% for NBFR.

What is the main difference between NBFR and FFTY?

NBFR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FFTY is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NBFR and 0.80% for FFTY.