NBET vs. TPZ

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

NBET (Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF) and TPZ (Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, NBET returned 18.97%/yr vs 25.21%/yr for TPZ. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NBET charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for TPZ.

Performance

NBET vs. TPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF (NBET) and Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF (TPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBET achieves a 24.96% return, which is significantly higher than TPZ's 10.28% return.

NBET

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: 3.89%
• 6M: 21.66%
• YTD: 24.96%
• 1Y: 28.57%
• 3Y*: 18.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TPZ

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 2.16%
• 6M: 7.44%
• YTD: 10.28%
• 1Y: 13.35%
• 3Y*: 25.21%
• 5Y*: 18.00%
• 10Y*: 8.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBET vs. TPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
NBET Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF	24.96%	5.87%	30.30%	7.48%	-6.07%
TPZ Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF	10.28%	5.67%	53.88%	20.72%	-3.66%

Correlation

The correlation between NBET and TPZ is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2022	0.60

The correlation between NBET and TPZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NBET vs. TPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBET

NBET Risk / Return Rank: 71
NBET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
NBET Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
NBET Omega Ratio Rank: 65
NBET Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
NBET Martin Ratio Rank: 63

TPZ

TPZ Risk / Return Rank: 37
TPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
TPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
TPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 30
TPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
TPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBET vs. TPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF (NBET) and Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF (TPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NBET	TPZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	0.97	+0.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.56	1.43	+1.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.17	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.59	2.13	+1.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.87	4.70	+4.16

NBET vs. TPZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBET Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the TPZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBET and TPZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NBET vs. TPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBET drawdown since its inception was -18.72%, smaller than the maximum TPZ drawdown of -78.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBET and TPZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	NBET	TPZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.72%	-78.17%	+59.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.00%	-6.29%	-1.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.72%	-17.78%	-0.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.78%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-77.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.77%	-2.59%	-1.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.08%	-11.88%	+6.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.23%	2.84%	+0.39%

Volatility

NBET vs. TPZ - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF (NBET) has a higher volatility of 4.88% compared to Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF (TPZ) at 3.91%. This indicates that NBET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NBET	TPZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.88%	3.91%	+0.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.54%	10.78%	+0.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.05%	13.76%	+1.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.46%	17.69%	+1.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.46%	27.70%	-8.24%

NBET vs. TPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBET has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than TPZ's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

NBET vs. TPZ - Dividend Comparison

NBET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, less than TPZ's 3.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NBET Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF	2.41%	2.70%	2.43%	1.22%	0.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TPZ Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF	3.69%	3.99%	5.88%	8.99%	9.52%	4.77%	8.80%	8.84%	9.41%	7.28%	6.88%	9.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NBET and TPZ in my portfolio?

NBET and TPZ have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NBET or TPZ?

NBET has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to TPZ (3.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBET dropped -18.72% vs TPZ's -78.17%.

Which ETF is better, NBET or TPZ?

On 3-year performance, TPZ leads with 25.21% vs 18.97% for NBET. On fees, NBET is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, TPZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NBET or TPZ?

Over the 3-year period, TPZ has performed better with a 25.21% return vs 18.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NBET or TPZ?

NBET is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TPZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NBET or TPZ?

TPZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.69%, compared with 2.41% for NBET.

What is the main difference between NBET and TPZ?

They also come from different issuers: Neuberger Berman and Tortoise. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for NBET and 0.85% for TPZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NBET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.