NBET vs. INFR

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

NBET (Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF) and INFR (ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF) are both Infrastructure Equities funds. NBET is actively managed, while INFR is passively managed. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. NBET charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for INFR.

Performance

NBET vs. INFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF (NBET) and ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NBET

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: 3.95%
• 6M: 14.68%
• YTD: 24.97%
• 1Y: 27.68%
• 3Y*: 19.60%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.70%

INFR

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
NBET Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF	$197.04K	$221.77K	$179.90K

NBET vs. INFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
NBET Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF	24.97%	5.87%	30.30%	7.48%	-3.47%
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF	1.41%	24.00%	-6.23%	5.20%	-0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between NBET and INFR is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2022	0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between NBET and INFR has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

NBET vs. INFR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NBET	INFR
Energy	88.9%	-
Utilities	8.6%	68.5%
Industrials	2.6%	27.5%
Basic Materials	0.9%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	4.1%
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

NBET vs. INFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NBET

NBET Risk / Return Rank: 74
NBET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
NBET Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
NBET Omega Ratio Rank: 68
NBET Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
NBET Martin Ratio Rank: 66

INFR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NBET vs. INFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF (NBET) and ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NBET	INFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.40	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.30	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.03	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	NBET	INFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.72%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.00%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.76%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.06%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.30%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NBET	INFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.11%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.79%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.92%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.43%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.43%	—	—

NBET vs. INFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBET has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than INFR's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

NBET vs. INFR - Dividend Comparison

NBET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, while INFR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF	1.71%	2.52%	2.36%	3.06%	0.00%
NBET Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF	2.41%	2.70%	2.43%	1.22%	0.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NBET and INFR in my portfolio?

NBET and INFR have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NBET or INFR?

On fees, INFR is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NBET or INFR?

INFR is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for NBET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NBET or INFR?

NBET has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 1.71% for INFR.

What is the main difference between NBET and INFR?

They also come from different issuers: Neuberger Berman and ClearBridge. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for NBET and 0.59% for INFR.