NBDS vs. TSXU
NBDS (Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF) and TSXU (Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - NBDS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Neuberger Berman, while TSXU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). NBDS is actively managed, while TSXU is passively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NBDS charges 0.55%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSXU.
Performance
NBDS vs. TSXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBDS achieves a 14.85% return, which is significantly lower than TSXU's 113.38% return.
NBDS
- 1D
- -3.68%
- 1M
- 4.22%
- YTD
- 14.85%
- 6M
- 12.50%
- 1Y
- 26.62%
- 3Y*
- 21.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSXU
- 1D
- -13.73%
- 1M
- 19.65%
- YTD
- 113.38%
- 6M
- 118.38%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NBDS vs. TSXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NBDS Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF | 14.85% | -1.72% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 113.38% | 37.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBDS and TSXU is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBDS vs. TSXU — Risk / Return Rank
NBDS
TSXU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NBDS vs. TSXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) and Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares (TSXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NBDS | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.90 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NBDS vs. TSXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBDS drawdown since its inception was -29.93%, smaller than the maximum TSXU drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBDS and TSXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBDS | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.93% | -35.62% | +5.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.68% | -13.73% | +10.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.48% | -10.67% | +1.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.19% | — | — |
Volatility
NBDS vs. TSXU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBDS | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.96% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.74% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.65% | 89.70% | -63.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.96% | 89.70% | -61.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.96% | 89.70% | -61.74% |
NBDS vs. TSXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBDS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than TSXU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
NBDS vs. TSXU - Dividend Comparison
NBDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than TSXU's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NBDS Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF | 0.33% | 0.38% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 1.36% | 2.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NBDS and TSXU have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NBDS is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NBDS is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSXU.
TSXU has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.33% for NBDS.
NBDS is categorized as Technology Equities, while TSXU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Neuberger Berman and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for NBDS and 1.05% for TSXU.
Find the right allocation for NBDS and TSXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer