NBDS vs. NEMD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NBDS (Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF) and NEMD (Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NBDS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Neuberger Berman, while NEMD is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund actively managed by Neuberger Berman. Both are actively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NBDS charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for NEMD.

Performance

NBDS vs. NEMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) and Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (NEMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBDS achieves a 17.73% return, which is significantly higher than NEMD's 3.76% return.

NBDS

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: 16.39%
• YTD: 17.73%
• 6M: 15.50%
• 1Y: 33.80%
• 3Y*: 23.07%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NEMD

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 1.56%
• YTD: 3.76%
• 6M: 4.02%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBDS vs. NEMD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NBDS Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF	17.73%	3.51%
NEMD Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF	3.76%	7.07%

Correlation

The correlation between NBDS and NEMD is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2025	0.56

NBDS vs. NEMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NBDS	NEMD
Technology	65.4%	-
Healthcare	9.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	6.5%	-
Industrials	5.8%	-
Financial Services	5.7%	-
Communication Services	4.4%	-
Utilities	3.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	100.0%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

NBDS vs. NEMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBDS

NBDS Risk / Return Rank: 34
NBDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
NBDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
NBDS Omega Ratio Rank: 38
NBDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
NBDS Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBDS vs. NEMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) and Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (NEMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NBDS	NEMD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.90	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.42	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.71	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NBDS	NEMD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.38	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	2.14	-1.62

Drawdowns

NBDS vs. NEMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBDS drawdown since its inception was -29.81%, which is greater than NEMD's maximum drawdown of -4.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBDS and NEMD.

Drawdown Indicators

	NBDS	NEMD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.81%	-4.43%	-25.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.96%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.69%	-0.39%	-0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.52%	-0.57%	-8.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.13%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NBDS	NEMD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.88%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.41%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.54%	6.51%	+18.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.64%	6.51%	+21.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.64%	6.51%	+21.13%

NBDS vs. NEMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBDS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than NEMD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

NBDS vs. NEMD - Dividend Comparison

NBDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than NEMD's 4.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
NBDS Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF	0.32%	0.38%
NEMD Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF	4.73%	2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NBDS and NEMD in my portfolio?

NBDS and NEMD have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NBDS or NEMD?

On fees, NBDS is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NBDS or NEMD?

NBDS is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for NEMD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NBDS or NEMD?

NEMD has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 0.32% for NBDS.

What is the main difference between NBDS and NEMD?

NBDS is categorized as Technology Equities, while NEMD is Emerging Markets Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for NBDS and 0.60% for NEMD.