NBCE vs. KSTR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NBCE (Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF) and KSTR (KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF) are both China Equities funds. NBCE is actively managed, while KSTR is passively managed. Over the past year, NBCE returned 62.13% vs 83.76% for KSTR. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NBCE charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for KSTR.

Performance

NBCE vs. KSTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF (NBCE) and KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBCE achieves a 25.89% return, which is significantly lower than KSTR's 32.94% return.

NBCE

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 8.36%
• YTD: 25.89%
• 6M: 30.43%
• 1Y: 62.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KSTR

• 1D: 1.39%
• 1M: 7.01%
• YTD: 32.94%
• 6M: 38.23%
• 1Y: 83.76%
• 3Y*: 16.36%
• 5Y*: -0.21%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBCE vs. KSTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NBCE Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF	25.89%	39.08%	3.35%	-2.22%
KSTR KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF	32.94%	42.82%	6.12%	-1.73%

Correlation

The correlation between NBCE and KSTR is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2023	0.77

The correlation between NBCE and KSTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

NBCE vs. KSTR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NBCE	KSTR
Technology	28.7%	78.5%
Industrials	17.3%	6.5%
Financial Services	15.2%	-
Basic Materials	13.7%	0.6%
Consumer Cyclical	7.9%	1.4%
Consumer Defensive	5.5%	-
Healthcare	4.6%	4.1%
Energy	3.5%	0.9%
Utilities	1.7%	-
Communication Services	1.2%	-
Real Estate	0.9%	-

Return for Risk

NBCE vs. KSTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBCE

NBCE Risk / Return Rank: 92
NBCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
NBCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
NBCE Omega Ratio Rank: 90
NBCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
NBCE Martin Ratio Rank: 92

KSTR

KSTR Risk / Return Rank: 71
KSTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
KSTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
KSTR Omega Ratio Rank: 65
KSTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
KSTR Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBCE vs. KSTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF (NBCE) and KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NBCE	KSTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.36	2.37	+0.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.29	3.02	+1.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.40	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.77	4.76	+2.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.69	12.06	+10.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NBCE vs. KSTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBCE Sharpe Ratio is 3.36, which is higher than the KSTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBCE and KSTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NBCE	KSTR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.36	2.37	+0.99
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.01	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.02	-0.00	+1.02

Drawdowns

NBCE vs. KSTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBCE drawdown since its inception was -28.42%, smaller than the maximum KSTR drawdown of -66.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBCE and KSTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	NBCE	KSTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.42%	-66.46%	+38.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.23%	-17.70%	+8.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-41.55%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-66.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.48%	-10.98%	+10.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.13%	-38.77%	+29.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.75%	6.97%	-4.22%

Volatility

NBCE vs. KSTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF (NBCE) is 7.20%, while KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR) has a volatility of 15.14%. This indicates that NBCE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KSTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NBCE	KSTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.20%	15.14%	-7.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.42%	26.21%	-12.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.59%	35.48%	-16.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.04%	38.31%	-14.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.04%	37.68%	-13.64%

NBCE vs. KSTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBCE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than KSTR's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

NBCE vs. KSTR - Dividend Comparison

NBCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while KSTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
KSTR KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NBCE Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF	1.05%	1.32%	1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NBCE and KSTR in my portfolio?

NBCE and KSTR have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NBCE or KSTR?

KSTR has higher volatility (15.14%) compared to NBCE (7.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBCE dropped -28.42% vs KSTR's -66.46%.

Which ETF is better, NBCE or KSTR?

On 1-year performance, KSTR leads with 83.76% vs 62.13% for NBCE. On fees, NBCE is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, NBCE has been the lower-risk option at 7.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NBCE or KSTR?

Over the 1-year period, KSTR has performed better with a 83.76% return vs 62.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NBCE or KSTR?

NBCE is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for KSTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NBCE or KSTR?

NBCE has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.00% for KSTR.

What is the main difference between NBCE and KSTR?

They also come from different issuers: Neuberger Berman and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for NBCE and 0.89% for KSTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NBCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.