NBCE vs. ISCMF

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

NBCE (Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NBCE is a China Equities fund actively managed by Neuberger Berman, while ISCMF is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. NBCE is actively managed, while ISCMF is passively managed. Over the past year, NBCE returned 47.02% vs 22.55% for ISCMF. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. NBCE charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ISCMF.

Performance

NBCE vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF (NBCE) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBCE achieves a 18.65% return, which is significantly higher than ISCMF's 11.96% return.

NBCE

• 1D: -3.59%
• 1M: -3.29%
• 6M: 13.41%
• YTD: 18.65%
• 1Y: 47.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ISCMF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -8.88%
• 6M: 11.96%
• YTD: 11.96%
• 1Y: 22.55%
• 3Y*: 10.82%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBCE vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NBCE Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF	18.65%	39.08%	3.35%	-2.22%
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF	11.96%	19.65%	3.13%	-5.76%

Correlation

The correlation between NBCE and ISCMF is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2023	-0.01

Return for Risk

NBCE vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBCE

NBCE Risk / Return Rank: 83
NBCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
NBCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
NBCE Omega Ratio Rank: 81
NBCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
NBCE Martin Ratio Rank: 88

ISCMF

ISCMF Risk / Return Rank: 55
ISCMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
ISCMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
ISCMF Omega Ratio Rank: 97
ISCMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
ISCMF Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBCE vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF (NBCE) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NBCE	ISCMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	1.16	+0.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.76	1.83	+0.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.84	-0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.64	1.66	+1.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.66	7.07	+7.59

NBCE vs. ISCMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBCE Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the ISCMF Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBCE and ISCMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NBCE vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBCE drawdown since its inception was -28.42%, which is greater than ISCMF's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBCE and ISCMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	NBCE	ISCMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.42%	-25.42%	-3.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.98%	-13.68%	+0.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.98%	-13.68%	+0.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.92%	-13.31%	+4.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.22%	3.20%	+0.02%

Volatility

NBCE vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF (NBCE) has a higher volatility of 11.84% compared to iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) at 9.30%. This indicates that NBCE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NBCE	ISCMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.84%	9.30%	+2.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.07%	18.12%	-0.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.28%	19.62%	+2.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.79%	14.84%	+9.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.79%	14.84%	+9.95%

NBCE vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBCE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

NBCE vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison

NBCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NBCE Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF	1.12%	1.32%	1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NBCE and ISCMF in my portfolio?

NBCE and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NBCE or ISCMF?

NBCE has higher volatility (11.84%) compared to ISCMF (9.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBCE dropped -28.42% vs ISCMF's -25.42%.

Which ETF is better, NBCE or ISCMF?

On 1-year performance, NBCE leads with 47.02% vs 22.55% for ISCMF. On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ISCMF has been the lower-risk option at 9.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NBCE or ISCMF?

Over the 1-year period, NBCE has performed better with a 47.02% return vs 22.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NBCE or ISCMF?

ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for NBCE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NBCE or ISCMF?

NBCE has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.

What is the main difference between NBCE and ISCMF?

NBCE is categorized as China Equities, while ISCMF is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Neuberger Berman and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for NBCE and 0.19% for ISCMF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NBCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.