NAWGX vs. IIBAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NAWGX (Voya Global High Dividend Low Volatility Fund) and IIBAX (Voya Intermediate Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - NAWGX is a Global Equities fund managed by Voya, while IIBAX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by Voya. Over the past 10 years, NAWGX returned 9.26%/yr vs 1.83%/yr for IIBAX. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. NAWGX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for IIBAX.

Performance

NAWGX vs. IIBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Global High Dividend Low Volatility Fund (NAWGX) and Voya Intermediate Bond Fund (IIBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAWGX achieves a 5.77% return, which is significantly higher than IIBAX's 0.53% return. Over the past 10 years, NAWGX has outperformed IIBAX with an annualized return of 9.26%, while IIBAX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.83% annualized return.

NAWGX

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 1.17%
• YTD: 5.77%
• 6M: 6.61%
• 1Y: 12.35%
• 3Y*: 14.87%
• 5Y*: 8.76%
• 10Y*: 9.26%

IIBAX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 0.53%
• 6M: 0.33%
• 1Y: 4.70%
• 3Y*: 4.53%
• 5Y*: 0.08%
• 10Y*: 1.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NAWGX vs. IIBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NAWGX Voya Global High Dividend Low Volatility Fund	5.77%	18.29%	12.15%	6.59%	-4.51%	20.66%	-1.23%	21.31%	-9.17%	24.32%
IIBAX Voya Intermediate Bond Fund	0.53%	6.42%	2.65%	7.04%	-15.11%	-1.79%	7.75%	9.57%	-0.59%	4.48%

Correlation

The correlation between NAWGX and IIBAX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 1998	-0.08

The correlation between NAWGX and IIBAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NAWGX vs. IIBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NAWGX

NAWGX Risk / Return Rank: 19
NAWGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
NAWGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
NAWGX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
NAWGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
NAWGX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

IIBAX

IIBAX Risk / Return Rank: 19
IIBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
IIBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
IIBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
IIBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
IIBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NAWGX vs. IIBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Global High Dividend Low Volatility Fund (NAWGX) and Voya Intermediate Bond Fund (IIBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NAWGX	IIBAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	1.21	-0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.31	1.80	-0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.22	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.45	1.69	-0.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.38	5.00	+2.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NAWGX vs. IIBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAWGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the IIBAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAWGX and IIBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NAWGX	IIBAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87	1.21	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	0.01	+0.67
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62	0.37	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.90	-0.43

Drawdowns

NAWGX vs. IIBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAWGX drawdown since its inception was -66.60%, which is greater than IIBAX's maximum drawdown of -20.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAWGX and IIBAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NAWGX	IIBAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.60%	-20.34%	-46.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.48%	-3.10%	-6.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.71%	-6.12%	-3.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.73%	-20.01%	+3.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.16%	-20.34%	-14.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.07%	-2.00%	+0.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.59%	-2.88%	-12.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.78%	1.04%	+0.74%

Volatility

NAWGX vs. IIBAX - Volatility Comparison

Voya Global High Dividend Low Volatility Fund (NAWGX) has a higher volatility of 12.99% compared to Voya Intermediate Bond Fund (IIBAX) at 1.64%. This indicates that NAWGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IIBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NAWGX	IIBAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.99%	1.64%	+11.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.03%	3.12%	+10.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.91%	4.35%	+11.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.23%	5.99%	+7.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.08%	5.03%	+10.05%

NAWGX vs. IIBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NAWGX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than IIBAX's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

NAWGX vs. IIBAX - Dividend Comparison

NAWGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than IIBAX's 3.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IIBAX Voya Intermediate Bond Fund	3.58%	3.43%	4.50%	4.05%	1.98%	2.03%	4.69%	3.23%	2.93%	2.88%	2.96%	2.45%
NAWGX Voya Global High Dividend Low Volatility Fund	4.54%	4.70%	1.85%	2.84%	3.09%	2.11%	1.99%	2.31%	3.11%	1.90%	1.38%	2.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NAWGX and IIBAX in my portfolio?

NAWGX and IIBAX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NAWGX or IIBAX?

NAWGX has higher volatility (12.99%) compared to IIBAX (1.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAWGX dropped -66.60% vs IIBAX's -20.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IIBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.