PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IIBAX vs. FIPDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IIBAX vs. FIPDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Intermediate Bond Fund (IIBAX) and Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FIPDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IIBAX achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than FIPDX's 1.11% return. Over the past 10 years, IIBAX has underperformed FIPDX with an annualized return of 1.80%, while FIPDX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.61% annualized return.


IIBAX

1D
0.23%
1M
0.94%
YTD
0.41%
6M
0.78%
1Y
3.98%
3Y*
4.49%
5Y*
-0.10%
10Y*
1.80%

FIPDX

1D
0.22%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.11%
6M
1.33%
1Y
3.98%
3Y*
3.85%
5Y*
1.08%
10Y*
2.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IIBAX vs. FIPDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IIBAX
Voya Intermediate Bond Fund
0.41%6.42%2.65%7.04%-15.11%-1.79%7.75%9.57%-0.59%4.48%
FIPDX
Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund
1.11%6.90%2.00%3.77%-12.09%5.94%10.90%8.32%-1.37%2.98%

Correlation

The correlation between IIBAX and FIPDX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2012

0.76

The correlation between IIBAX and FIPDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IIBAX vs. FIPDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IIBAX
IIBAX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
IIBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IIBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
IIBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
IIBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
IIBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

FIPDX
FIPDX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FIPDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIPDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIPDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
FIPDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIPDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IIBAX vs. FIPDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Intermediate Bond Fund (IIBAX) and Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FIPDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IIBAXFIPDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.23

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

2.18

-0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.04

6.33

-2.29

IIBAX vs. FIPDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IIBAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is comparable to the FIPDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IIBAX and FIPDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IIBAX vs. FIPDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IIBAX drawdown since its inception was -20.34%, which is greater than FIPDX's maximum drawdown of -14.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIBAX and FIPDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IIBAXFIPDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.34%

-14.32%

-6.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.10%

-1.94%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.12%

-4.49%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.01%

-14.32%

-5.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.34%

-14.32%

-6.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.11%

-0.65%

-1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.88%

-4.46%

+1.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

0.67%

+0.39%

Volatility

IIBAX vs. FIPDX - Volatility Comparison

Voya Intermediate Bond Fund (IIBAX) has a higher volatility of 1.35% compared to Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FIPDX) at 1.10%. This indicates that IIBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIPDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IIBAXFIPDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

1.10%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.20%

2.39%

+0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.31%

3.34%

+0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.00%

5.97%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.04%

5.37%

-0.33%

IIBAX vs. FIPDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IIBAX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than FIPDX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

IIBAX vs. FIPDX - Dividend Comparison

IIBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, less than FIPDX's 3.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIPDX
Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund
3.81%4.18%3.75%3.56%8.87%4.76%1.24%1.97%2.26%1.29%1.34%0.38%
IIBAX
Voya Intermediate Bond Fund
3.59%3.43%4.50%4.05%1.98%2.03%4.69%3.23%2.93%2.88%2.96%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


IIBAX and FIPDX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IIBAX has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to FIPDX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IIBAX dropped -20.34% vs FIPDX's -14.32%.

FIPDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IIBAX and FIPDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer