NAUG vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NAUG (Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - NAUG is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. NAUG is actively managed, while BNO is passively managed. Over the past year, NAUG returned 17.67% vs 88.71% for BNO. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. NAUG charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.

Performance

NAUG vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF (NAUG) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAUG achieves a 6.71% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 85.31% return.

NAUG

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 1.69%
• YTD: 6.71%
• 6M: 7.26%
• 1Y: 17.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BNO

• 1D: -2.71%
• 1M: -9.80%
• YTD: 85.31%
• 6M: 79.66%
• 1Y: 88.71%
• 3Y*: 26.74%
• 5Y*: 23.48%
• 10Y*: 13.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NAUG vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NAUG Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF	6.71%	14.81%	7.13%
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	85.31%	-5.44%	-2.85%

Correlation

The correlation between NAUG and BNO is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2024	-0.08

The correlation between NAUG and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to -0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NAUG vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NAUG

NAUG Risk / Return Rank: 78
NAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
NAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
NAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 81
NAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
NAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 84

BNO

BNO Risk / Return Rank: 65
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 61
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NAUG vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF (NAUG) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NAUG	BNO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.42	2.15	+0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	2.65	+0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.36	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.48	4.99	-1.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.99	9.39	+7.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NAUG vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAUG Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAUG and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NAUG	BNO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.42	2.15	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.67	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.43	0.14	+1.30

Drawdowns

NAUG vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAUG drawdown since its inception was -12.88%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAUG and BNO.

Drawdown Indicators

	NAUG	BNO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.88%	-87.06%	+74.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.10%	-17.87%	+12.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.75%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.70%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-12.72%	+12.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.20%	-40.16%	+38.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.04%	9.48%	-8.44%

Volatility

NAUG vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF (NAUG) is 0.61%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 14.12%. This indicates that NAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NAUG	BNO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.61%	14.12%	-13.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.53%	36.21%	-30.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.35%	41.56%	-34.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.21%	35.40%	-24.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.21%	36.69%	-25.48%

NAUG vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

NAUG has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

NAUG vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

Neither NAUG nor BNO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NAUG and BNO in my portfolio?

NAUG and BNO have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NAUG or BNO?

BNO has higher volatility (14.12%) compared to NAUG (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAUG dropped -12.88% vs BNO's -87.06%.

Which ETF is better, NAUG or BNO?

On 1-year performance, BNO leads with 88.71% vs 17.67% for NAUG. On fees, NAUG is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, NAUG has been the lower-risk option at 0.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NAUG or BNO?

Over the 1-year period, BNO has performed better with a 88.71% return vs 17.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NAUG or BNO?

NAUG is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NAUG or BNO?

NAUG and BNO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between NAUG and BNO?

NAUG is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NAUG and 0.90% for BNO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NAUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.