NATO vs. WDGF

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF (NATO) and WisdomTree Global Defense Fund (WDGF).

NATO and WDGF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NATO is a passively managed fund by Themes that tracks the performance of the Solactive Transatlantic Aerospace and Defense Index. It was launched on Oct 10, 2024. WDGF is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree Global Defense Index. It was launched on Sep 10, 2025. Both NATO and WDGF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

NATO vs. WDGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF (NATO) and WisdomTree Global Defense Fund (WDGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NATO vs. WDGF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NATO Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF	0.78%	2.86%
WDGF WisdomTree Global Defense Fund	7.15%	-0.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NATO achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly lower than WDGF's 7.15% return.

NATO

• 1D: 3.75%
• 1M: -11.24%
• YTD: 0.78%
• 6M: -1.05%
• 1Y: 34.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WDGF

• 1D: 3.33%
• 1M: -6.23%
• YTD: 7.15%
• 6M: 1.79%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NATO vs. WDGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

NATO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than WDGF's 0.45% expense ratio.

WDGF

WisdomTree Global Defense Fund

NATO

Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF

Return for Risk

NATO vs. WDGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NATO

NATO Risk / Return Rank: 81
NATO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
NATO Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
NATO Omega Ratio Rank: 80
NATO Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
NATO Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NATO vs. WDGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF (NATO) and WisdomTree Global Defense Fund (WDGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NATO	WDGF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.14	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.15	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.09	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NATO	WDGF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.53	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.56	0.61	+0.95

Correlation

The correlation between NATO and WDGF is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

NATO vs. WDGF - Dividend Comparison

NATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, more than WDGF's 0.05% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
NATO Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF	0.45%	0.45%	0.08%
WDGF WisdomTree Global Defense Fund	0.05%	0.05%	0.00%

Drawdowns

NATO vs. WDGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NATO drawdown since its inception was -15.99%, which is greater than WDGF's maximum drawdown of -13.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NATO and WDGF.

Drawdown Indicators

	NATO	WDGF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.99%	-13.29%	-2.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.83%	-9.28%	-3.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.86%	-4.46%	+1.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.26%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NATO	WDGF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.45%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.04%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.63%	21.55%	+1.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.75%	21.55%	+0.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.75%	21.55%	+0.20%