WDGF vs. REGB.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Global Defense Fund (WDGF) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L).

WDGF and REGB.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WDGF is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree Global Defense Index. It was launched on Sep 10, 2025. REGB.L is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. It was launched on Sep 24, 2021. Both WDGF and REGB.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

WDGF vs. REGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Global Defense Fund (WDGF) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WDGF vs. REGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WDGF WisdomTree Global Defense Fund	11.17%	-0.25%
REGB.L VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A	20.86%	27.24%

Different Trading Currencies

WDGF is traded in USD, while REGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the REGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDGF achieves a 11.17% return, which is significantly lower than REGB.L's 20.86% return.

WDGF

• 1D: 3.75%
• 1M: -5.19%
• YTD: 11.17%
• 6M: 5.45%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

REGB.L

• 1D: 2.96%
• 1M: -12.38%
• YTD: 20.86%
• 6M: 35.05%
• 1Y: 128.30%
• 3Y*: 3.85%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDGF vs. REGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WDGF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than REGB.L's 0.59% expense ratio.

REGB.L

VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A

WDGF

WisdomTree Global Defense Fund

Return for Risk

WDGF vs. REGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REGB.L

REGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 95
REGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
REGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
REGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 90
REGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
REGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDGF vs. REGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global Defense Fund (WDGF) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WDGF	REGB.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.84	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.95	-0.02	+0.97

Correlation

The correlation between WDGF and REGB.L is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

WDGF vs. REGB.L - Dividend Comparison

WDGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, while REGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025
WDGF WisdomTree Global Defense Fund	0.04%	0.05%
REGB.L VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

WDGF vs. REGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDGF drawdown since its inception was -13.29%, smaller than the maximum REGB.L drawdown of -73.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDGF and REGB.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	WDGF	REGB.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.29%	-72.41%	+59.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-20.93%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.88%	-28.59%	+22.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.47%	-40.81%	+36.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	7.53%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WDGF	REGB.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.92%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	36.19%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.05%	44.98%	-22.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.05%	46.74%	-24.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.05%	46.74%	-24.69%