NASL.L vs. IUMO.L
NASL.L (Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR) and IUMO.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - NASL.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, while IUMO.L is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NASL.L returned 19.05%/yr vs 15.32%/yr for IUMO.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NASL.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IUMO.L.
Performance
NASL.L vs. IUMO.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NASL.L is traded in GBp, while IUMO.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUMO.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NASL.L achieves a 19.92% return, which is significantly lower than IUMO.L's 30.05% return.
NASL.L
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 9.61%
- YTD
- 19.92%
- 6M
- 18.45%
- 1Y
- 41.87%
- 3Y*
- 24.89%
- 5Y*
- 19.05%
- 10Y*
- —
IUMO.L
- 1D
- -1.94%
- 1M
- 13.08%
- YTD
- 30.05%
- 6M
- 28.85%
- 1Y
- 40.72%
- 3Y*
- 28.90%
- 5Y*
- 15.32%
- 10Y*
- —
NASL.L vs. IUMO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NASL.L Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR | 19.92% | 11.71% | 28.78% | 47.95% | -25.38% | 29.78% | 43.43% | 33.70% | -2.99% |
IUMO.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc | 30.05% | 9.75% | 33.79% | 4.34% | -8.42% | 13.67% | 24.39% | 24.43% | -4.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between NASL.L and IUMO.L is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2018 | 0.76 |
The correlation between NASL.L and IUMO.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
NASL.L vs. IUMO.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NASL.L
IUMO.L
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
NASL.L
IUMO.L
Communication Services
NASL.L
IUMO.L
Consumer Cyclical
NASL.L
IUMO.L
Consumer Defensive
NASL.L
IUMO.L
Healthcare
NASL.L
IUMO.L
Industrials
NASL.L
IUMO.L
Utilities
NASL.L
IUMO.L
Basic Materials
NASL.L
IUMO.L
Energy
NASL.L
IUMO.L
Financial Services
NASL.L
IUMO.L
Real Estate
NASL.L
IUMO.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NASL.L vs. IUMO.L — Risk / Return Rank
NASL.L
IUMO.L
NASL.L vs. IUMO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR (NASL.L) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUMO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NASL.L | IUMO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.38 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.76 | 4.36 | -0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.99 | 13.64 | -2.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NASL.L | IUMO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.85 | 2.13 | +0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 | 0.80 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 0.92 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
NASL.L vs. IUMO.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NASL.L drawdown since its inception was -27.49%, which is greater than IUMO.L's maximum drawdown of -25.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NASL.L and IUMO.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NASL.L | IUMO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.49% | -25.81% | -1.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.08% | -9.26% | -1.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.53% | -22.10% | -2.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.49% | -24.52% | -2.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -1.94% | +1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.14% | -7.00% | +0.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.80% | 2.97% | +0.83% |
Volatility
NASL.L vs. IUMO.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR (NASL.L) is 4.15%, while iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUMO.L) has a volatility of 8.23%. This indicates that NASL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUMO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NASL.L | IUMO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 8.23% | -4.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.24% | 16.02% | -5.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.63% | 18.92% | -4.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.01% | 19.17% | -0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.90% | 20.35% | -0.45% |
NASL.L vs. IUMO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
NASL.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IUMO.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
NASL.L vs. IUMO.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither NASL.L nor IUMO.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUMO.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NASL.L Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.69% | 0.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NASL.L and IUMO.L have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUMO.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUMO.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for NASL.L.
NASL.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while IUMO.L is Momentum. NASL.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, while IUMO.L tracks MSCI USA Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for NASL.L and 0.20% for IUMO.L.
Find the right allocation for NASL.L and IUMO.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer