NASL.L vs. FEXD.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NASL.L (Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR) and FEXD.L (First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS Class B) are both exchange-traded funds - NASL.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, while FEXD.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NASL.L returned 19.05%/yr vs 10.82%/yr for FEXD.L. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NASL.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FEXD.L.

Performance

NASL.L vs. FEXD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR (NASL.L) and First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS Class B (FEXD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NASL.L achieves a 19.92% return, which is significantly higher than FEXD.L's 14.06% return.

NASL.L

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: 9.61%
• YTD: 19.92%
• 6M: 18.45%
• 1Y: 41.87%
• 3Y*: 24.89%
• 5Y*: 19.05%
• 10Y*: —

FEXD.L

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 5.28%
• YTD: 14.06%
• 6M: 14.03%
• 1Y: 28.95%
• 3Y*: 16.32%
• 5Y*: 10.82%
• 10Y*: 12.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NASL.L vs. FEXD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
NASL.L Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR	19.92%	11.71%	28.78%	47.95%	-25.38%	29.78%	43.43%	33.70%	-2.99%
FEXD.L First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS Class B	14.06%	6.55%	17.43%	7.00%	-3.00%	26.00%	9.31%	21.74%	-7.73%

Correlation

The correlation between NASL.L and FEXD.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2018	0.55

The correlation between NASL.L and FEXD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NASL.L vs. FEXD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NASL.L

NASL.L Risk / Return Rank: 78
NASL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
NASL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
NASL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 82
NASL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
NASL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 62

FEXD.L

FEXD.L Risk / Return Rank: 93
FEXD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
FEXD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
FEXD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FEXD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FEXD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NASL.L vs. FEXD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR (NASL.L) and First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS Class B (FEXD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NASL.L	FEXD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.85	3.19	-0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.68	4.43	-0.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.57	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.76	8.72	-4.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.99	28.19	-17.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NASL.L vs. FEXD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NASL.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is comparable to the FEXD.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NASL.L and FEXD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NASL.L	FEXD.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.85	3.19	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00	0.84	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.88	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.05	0.80	+0.25

Drawdowns

NASL.L vs. FEXD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NASL.L drawdown since its inception was -27.49%, smaller than the maximum FEXD.L drawdown of -31.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NASL.L and FEXD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	NASL.L	FEXD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.49%	-31.91%	+4.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.08%	-4.52%	-6.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.53%	-21.63%	-2.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.49%	-21.63%	-5.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.74%	-0.11%	-0.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.14%	-4.35%	-1.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.80%	4.88%	-1.08%

Volatility

NASL.L vs. FEXD.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR (NASL.L) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS Class B (FEXD.L) at 3.73%. This indicates that NASL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEXD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NASL.L	FEXD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.15%	3.73%	+0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.24%	9.14%	+1.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.63%	12.33%	+2.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.01%	16.33%	+2.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.90%	18.76%	+1.14%

NASL.L vs. FEXD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

NASL.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FEXD.L's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

NASL.L vs. FEXD.L - Dividend Comparison

NASL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FEXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FEXD.L First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS Class B	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%
NASL.L Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.69%	0.68%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NASL.L and FEXD.L in my portfolio?

NASL.L and FEXD.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NASL.L or FEXD.L?

On fees, NASL.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NASL.L or FEXD.L?

NASL.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FEXD.L.

What is the main difference between NASL.L and FEXD.L?

NASL.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while FEXD.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. NASL.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, while FEXD.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for NASL.L and 0.75% for FEXD.L.