NASA vs. DFEN
NASA (Tema Space Innovators ETF) and DFEN (Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - NASA is a Aerospace & Defense fund actively managed by Tema, while DFEN is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index (300%). NASA is actively managed, while DFEN is passively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NASA charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for DFEN.
Performance
NASA vs. DFEN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NASA
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- -5.88%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFEN
- 1D
- 4.39%
- 1M
- 27.13%
- YTD
- 18.09%
- 6M
- 25.12%
- 1Y
- 82.69%
- 3Y*
- 66.62%
- 5Y*
- 30.97%
- 10Y*
- —
NASA vs. DFEN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NASA Tema Space Innovators ETF | 34.77% |
DFEN Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares | 32.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between NASA and DFEN is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2026 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NASA vs. DFEN — Risk / Return Rank
NASA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DFEN
NASA vs. DFEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Space Innovators ETF (NASA) and Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares (DFEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NASA | DFEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.99 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.60 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NASA vs. DFEN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NASA drawdown since its inception was -25.42%, smaller than the maximum DFEN drawdown of -91.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NASA and DFEN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NASA | DFEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.42% | -91.36% | +65.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -41.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -43.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.46% | -22.62% | +0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.71% | -45.19% | +39.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 18.04% | — |
Volatility
NASA vs. DFEN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NASA | DFEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 27.48% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 55.73% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.70% | 66.02% | +2.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.70% | 60.79% | +7.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.70% | 71.66% | -2.96% |
NASA vs. DFEN - Expense Ratio Comparison
NASA has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than DFEN's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
NASA vs. DFEN - Dividend Comparison
NASA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DFEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.56%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFEN Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares | 7.56% | 8.89% | 14.12% | 1.13% | 0.46% | 1.89% | 0.48% | 0.50% | 1.07% | 1.50% |
NASA Tema Space Innovators ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NASA and DFEN have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NASA is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NASA is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for DFEN.
DFEN has the higher dividend yield at 7.56%, compared with 0.00% for NASA.
NASA is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while DFEN is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Tema and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NASA and 0.99% for DFEN.
Find the right allocation for NASA and DFEN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer