PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NAS.OL vs. TGS.OL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NAS.OL vs. TGS.OL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a NOK 10,000 investment in Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA (NAS.OL) and TGS NOPEC Geophysical Company ASA (TGS.OL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAS.OL achieves a -10.90% return, which is significantly lower than TGS.OL's 101.20% return. Over the past 10 years, NAS.OL has underperformed TGS.OL with an annualized return of -46.94%, while TGS.OL has yielded a comparatively higher 56.99% annualized return.


NAS.OL

1D
-10.89%
1M
6.42%
YTD
-10.90%
6M
-10.61%
1Y
16.85%
3Y*
8.24%
5Y*
8.32%
10Y*
-46.94%

TGS.OL

1D
-4.29%
1M
2.40%
YTD
101.20%
6M
110.86%
1Y
251.57%
3Y*
86.97%
5Y*
82.09%
10Y*
56.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NAS.OL vs. TGS.OL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NAS.OL
Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
-10.90%67.67%2.61%45.97%-31.68%-73.53%-97.70%-62.16%-0.80%-38.68%
TGS.OL
TGS NOPEC Geophysical Company ASA
101.20%89.38%60.44%52.93%137.93%-4.95%-23.33%85.17%32.84%27.07%

Correlation

The correlation between NAS.OL and TGS.OL is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2003

0.18

The correlation between NAS.OL and TGS.OL shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NAS.OL vs. TGS.OL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NAS.OL
NAS.OL Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
NAS.OL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAS.OL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAS.OL Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
NAS.OL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAS.OL Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

TGS.OL
TGS.OL Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
TGS.OL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGS.OL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGS.OL Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
TGS.OL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGS.OL Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NAS.OL vs. TGS.OL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA (NAS.OL) and TGS NOPEC Geophysical Company ASA (TGS.OL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NAS.OLTGS.OLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.72

-0.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

14.57

-13.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.59

49.48

-47.89

NAS.OL vs. TGS.OL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAS.OL Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the TGS.OL Sharpe Ratio of 4.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAS.OL and TGS.OL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NAS.OLTGS.OLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

4.78

-4.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

1.59

-1.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.59

1.16

-1.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.25

0.61

-0.87

Drawdowns

NAS.OL vs. TGS.OL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAS.OL drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, which is greater than TGS.OL's maximum drawdown of -82.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAS.OL and TGS.OL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NAS.OLTGS.OLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.94%

-82.61%

-17.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.87%

-17.64%

-8.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.60%

-37.42%

-8.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.36%

-37.42%

-12.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.93%

-58.27%

-41.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.84%

-4.90%

-94.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.48%

-21.42%

-32.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.70%

5.17%

+5.53%

Volatility

NAS.OL vs. TGS.OL - Volatility Comparison

Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA (NAS.OL) and TGS NOPEC Geophysical Company ASA (TGS.OL) have volatilities of 15.23% and 14.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NAS.OLTGS.OLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.23%

14.67%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.29%

30.91%

-1.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.20%

53.97%

-15.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.16%

51.87%

-6.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

79.34%

49.23%

+30.11%

Dividends

NAS.OL vs. TGS.OL - Dividend Comparison

NAS.OL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.54%, less than TGS.OL's 39.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NAS.OL
Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
11.54%5.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TGS.OL
TGS NOPEC Geophysical Company ASA
39.96%73.70%57.40%47.46%40.42%47.82%49.57%31.50%25.28%20.86%21.78%44.78%

Financials

NAS.OL vs. TGS.OL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA and TGS NOPEC Geophysical Company ASA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in NOK except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NAS.OL and TGS.OL have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NAS.OL and TGS.OL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer