NANR vs. XTL
NANR (SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF) and XTL (SPDR S&P Telecom ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NANR is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the S&P BMI North American Natural Resources Index, while XTL is a Communications Equities fund tracking the S&P Telecom Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NANR returned 12.52%/yr vs 16.51%/yr for XTL. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
NANR vs. XTL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NANR achieves a 24.07% return, which is significantly lower than XTL's 56.08% return. Over the past 10 years, NANR has underperformed XTL with an annualized return of 12.52%, while XTL has yielded a comparatively higher 16.51% annualized return.
NANR
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 2.37%
- YTD
- 24.07%
- 6M
- 26.38%
- 1Y
- 53.70%
- 3Y*
- 20.80%
- 5Y*
- 16.21%
- 10Y*
- 12.52%
XTL
- 1D
- -3.76%
- 1M
- 5.66%
- YTD
- 56.08%
- 6M
- 62.03%
- 1Y
- 130.19%
- 3Y*
- 48.87%
- 5Y*
- 19.82%
- 10Y*
- 16.51%
NANR vs. XTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NANR SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF | 24.07% | 35.35% | 2.31% | -3.23% | 26.49% | 36.43% | 1.03% | 18.99% | -16.77% | 8.03% |
XTL SPDR S&P Telecom ETF | 56.08% | 44.95% | 34.89% | -1.17% | -19.18% | 21.58% | 22.46% | 12.51% | -6.60% | 0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between NANR and XTL is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2015 | 0.47 |
The correlation between NANR and XTL shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.48 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NANR vs. XTL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NANR
XTL
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
Technology
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Basic Materials
NANR
XTL
-
Energy
NANR
XTL
-
Consumer Cyclical
NANR
XTL
-
Consumer Defensive
NANR
XTL
-
Real Estate
NANR
XTL
Technology
NANR
XTL
Industrials
NANR
XTL
-
Utilities
NANR
XTL
-
Communication Services
NANR
-
XTL
Financial Services
NANR
-
XTL
-
Healthcare
NANR
-
XTL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NANR vs. XTL — Risk / Return Rank
NANR
XTL
NANR vs. XTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) and SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NANR | XTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.64 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.04 | 8.91 | -2.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.31 | 40.85 | -19.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NANR | XTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.98 | 4.51 | -1.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.79 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.70 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.53 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
NANR vs. XTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NANR drawdown since its inception was -49.15%, which is greater than XTL's maximum drawdown of -37.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NANR and XTL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NANR | XTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.15% | -37.01% | -12.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | -14.70% | +5.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.42% | -22.79% | +4.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.42% | -37.01% | +10.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.15% | -37.01% | -12.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.35% | -3.76% | +1.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.40% | -9.77% | +1.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 3.20% | -0.67% |
Volatility
NANR vs. XTL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) is 4.92%, while SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) has a volatility of 8.96%. This indicates that NANR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NANR | XTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.92% | 8.96% | -4.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.38% | 22.92% | -8.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.13% | 29.07% | -10.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.89% | 25.10% | -2.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.54% | 23.53% | +0.01% |
NANR vs. XTL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both NANR and XTL have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
NANR vs. XTL - Dividend Comparison
NANR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, more than XTL's 0.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NANR SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF | 1.69% | 1.77% | 2.20% | 2.78% | 2.70% | 2.61% | 2.73% | 2.02% | 1.95% | 1.83% | 5.01% | 0.01% |
XTL SPDR S&P Telecom ETF | 0.83% | 1.05% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.74% | 1.25% | 0.88% | 0.92% | 1.90% | 2.08% | 1.11% | 1.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NANR and XTL have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XTL has higher volatility (8.96%) compared to NANR (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NANR dropped -49.15% vs XTL's -37.01%.
On 10-year performance, XTL leads with 16.51% vs 12.52% for NANR. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, NANR has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XTL has performed better with a 16.51% return vs 12.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NANR and XTL have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
NANR has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 0.83% for XTL.
NANR is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while XTL is Communications Equities. NANR tracks S&P BMI North American Natural Resources Index, while XTL tracks S&P Telecom Select Industry Index.
XTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.51 vs 2.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NANR and XTL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer