PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
NANR vs. GNR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

NANR vs. GNR

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) and SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR).

NANR and GNR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NANR is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P BMI North American Natural Resources Index. It was launched on Dec 15, 2015. GNR is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Natural Resources Index. It was launched on Sep 13, 2010. Both NANR and GNR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

NANR vs. GNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) and SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NANR vs. GNR - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NANR
SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF		23.68%35.35%2.31%-3.23%26.49%36.43%1.03%18.99%-16.77%8.03%
GNR
SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF		19.84%28.68%-8.27%2.95%10.20%24.73%-0.03%16.49%-13.19%22.64%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NANR achieves a 23.68% return, which is significantly higher than GNR's 19.84% return. Over the past 10 years, NANR has outperformed GNR with an annualized return of 14.17%, while GNR has yielded a comparatively lower 11.63% annualized return.

NANR

1D
-0.13%
1M
-2.66%
YTD
23.68%
6M
30.97%
1Y
53.36%
3Y*
18.77%
5Y*
19.18%
10Y*
14.17%

GNR

1D
-0.27%
1M
-1.86%
YTD
19.84%
6M
27.71%
1Y
43.54%
3Y*
13.30%
5Y*
11.99%
10Y*
11.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF

SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF

Often compared with NANR:
NANR vs. IGENANR vs. HAPNANR vs. FXZNANR vs. XLENANR vs. FTRINANR vs. VOONANR vs. FXAIX
Often compared with GNR:
GNR vs. REMXGNR vs. XLEGNR vs. BCIGNR vs. VAWGNR vs. SPYGNR vs. XLBGNR vs. MXI

NANR vs. GNR - Expense Ratio Comparison

NANR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GNR's 0.40% expense ratio.

GNR
SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
NANR
SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF

Return for Risk

NANR vs. GNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
NANR
NANR Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
NANR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NANR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
NANR Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
NANR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
NANR Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
GNR
GNR Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
GNR Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
GNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GNR Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NANR vs. GNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) and SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

NANRGNRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.33

2.11

+0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.85

2.71

+0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.41

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

2.98

+0.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.72

15.59

+0.13

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NANR vs. GNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NANR Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the GNR Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NANR and GNR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

NANRGNRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.11

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.59

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.53

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.26

+0.37

Correlation

The correlation between NANR and GNR is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

NANR vs. GNR - Dividend Comparison

NANR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than GNR's 2.31% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NANR
SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF		1.43%1.77%2.20%2.78%2.70%2.61%2.73%2.02%1.95%1.83%5.01%0.01%
GNR
SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF		2.31%2.76%4.73%3.37%4.37%3.44%2.78%3.84%3.51%2.40%2.06%4.59%

Drawdowns

NANR vs. GNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NANR drawdown since its inception was -49.15%, roughly equal to the maximum GNR drawdown of -51.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NANR and GNR.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

NANRGNRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.15%

-51.37%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.17%

-14.80%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.42%

-25.66%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.15%

-48.59%

-0.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.66%

-1.86%

-0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.48%

-15.10%

+6.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

2.83%

+0.61%

Volatility

NANR vs. GNR - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) and SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) have volatilities of 5.37% and 5.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

NANRGNRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.37%

5.51%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.56%

13.76%

+1.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.03%

20.70%

+2.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.10%

20.35%

+2.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.74%

22.01%

+1.73%