PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NANR vs. BIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NANR vs. BIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NANR achieves a 24.07% return, which is significantly higher than BIL's 1.49% return. Over the past 10 years, NANR has outperformed BIL with an annualized return of 12.52%, while BIL has yielded a comparatively lower 2.18% annualized return.


NANR

1D
-0.54%
1M
2.37%
YTD
24.07%
6M
26.38%
1Y
53.70%
3Y*
20.80%
5Y*
16.21%
10Y*
12.52%

BIL

1D
0.02%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.77%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
3.41%
10Y*
2.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NANR vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NANR
SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF
24.07%35.35%2.31%-3.23%26.49%36.43%1.03%18.99%-16.77%8.03%
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
1.49%4.15%5.19%4.94%1.40%-0.10%0.40%2.03%1.74%0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between NANR and BIL is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2015

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NANR vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NANR
NANR Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
NANR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NANR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
NANR Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
NANR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
NANR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NANR vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NANRBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-16.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-170.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

87.91

-86.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.04

355.35

-349.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.31

2,817.77

-2,796.46

NANR vs. BIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NANR Sharpe Ratio is 2.98, which is lower than the BIL Sharpe Ratio of 19.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NANR and BIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NANRBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.98

19.71

-16.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

13.16

-12.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

8.52

-7.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

2.78

-2.15

Drawdowns

NANR vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NANR drawdown since its inception was -49.15%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NANR and BIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NANRBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.15%

-0.78%

-48.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-0.01%

-8.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.42%

-0.01%

-18.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.42%

-0.10%

-26.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.15%

-0.21%

-48.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.35%

0.00%

-2.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.40%

-0.26%

-8.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

0.00%

+2.53%

Volatility

NANR vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.05%. This indicates that NANR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NANRBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.92%

0.05%

+4.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.38%

0.13%

+14.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.13%

0.20%

+17.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.89%

0.26%

+22.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.54%

0.26%

+23.28%

NANR vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

NANR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

NANR vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison

NANR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, less than BIL's 3.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.86%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%0.00%
NANR
SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF
1.69%1.77%2.20%2.78%2.70%2.61%2.73%2.02%1.95%1.83%5.01%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


NANR and BIL have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NANR has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to BIL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NANR dropped -49.15% vs BIL's -0.78%.

On 10-year performance, NANR leads with 12.52% vs 2.18% for BIL. On fees, BIL is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, BIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, NANR has performed better with a 12.52% return vs 2.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BIL is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NANR.

BIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 1.69% for NANR.

NANR is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while BIL is Government Bonds. NANR tracks S&P BMI North American Natural Resources Index, while BIL tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NANR and 0.14% for BIL.

BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.71 vs 2.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NANR and BIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer