NAN vs. JQC

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

NAN (Nuveen New York Quality Municipal Income Fund) and JQC (Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund) are both mutual funds - NAN is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Nuveen, while JQC is a Bank Loan fund managed by Nuveen. Over the past 10 years, NAN returned 2.31%/yr vs 5.73%/yr for JQC. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NAN charges 0.04%/yr vs 4.34%/yr for JQC.

Performance

NAN vs. JQC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen New York Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAN) and Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAN achieves a 7.58% return, which is significantly higher than JQC's 1.77% return. Over the past 10 years, NAN has underperformed JQC with an annualized return of 2.31%, while JQC has yielded a comparatively higher 5.73% annualized return.

NAN

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 2.17%
• 6M: 6.26%
• YTD: 7.58%
• 1Y: 10.07%
• 3Y*: 10.01%
• 5Y*: 0.66%
• 10Y*: 2.31%

JQC

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.41%
• 6M: -0.60%
• YTD: 1.77%
• 1Y: -0.85%
• 3Y*: 10.59%
• 5Y*: 4.53%
• 10Y*: 5.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NAN vs. JQC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NAN Nuveen New York Quality Municipal Income Fund	7.58%	6.57%	10.20%	7.72%	-24.07%	9.00%	4.17%	20.91%	-7.22%	8.45%
JQC Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund	1.77%	-0.36%	22.29%	15.26%	-14.22%	13.29%	-2.96%	21.78%	-4.33%	-0.27%

Correlation

The correlation between NAN and JQC is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2003	0.18

The correlation between NAN and JQC shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NAN vs. JQC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NAN

NAN Risk / Return Rank: 40
NAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
NAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
NAN Omega Ratio Rank: 41
NAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
NAN Martin Ratio Rank: 37

JQC

JQC Risk / Return Rank: 3
JQC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
JQC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
JQC Omega Ratio Rank: 3
JQC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
JQC Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NAN vs. JQC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen New York Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAN) and Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NAN	JQC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	-0.08	+1.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.09	-0.03	+2.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.00	+0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.87	-0.08	+1.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.38	-0.16	+6.54

NAN vs. JQC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAN Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the JQC Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAN and JQC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NAN vs. JQC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAN drawdown since its inception was -44.96%, smaller than the maximum JQC drawdown of -75.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAN and JQC.

Drawdown Indicators

	NAN	JQC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.96%	-75.18%	+30.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.41%	-10.15%	+4.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.53%	-15.37%	+0.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.64%	-19.83%	-14.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.64%	-47.99%	+13.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.85%	-4.36%	+3.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.03%	-8.80%	+0.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.60%	5.23%	-3.63%

Volatility

NAN vs. JQC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen New York Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAN) is 1.56%, while Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC) has a volatility of 1.77%. This indicates that NAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JQC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NAN	JQC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.56%	1.77%	-0.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.30%	8.72%	-3.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.18%	11.19%	-4.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.30%	13.13%	-2.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.14%	17.52%	-6.38%

NAN vs. JQC - Expense Ratio Comparison

NAN has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than JQC's 4.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

NAN vs. JQC - Dividend Comparison

NAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.37%, less than JQC's 13.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JQC Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund	13.13%	12.91%	11.39%	11.42%	9.71%	10.03%	16.11%	16.14%	6.53%	7.42%	6.99%	7.51%
NAN Nuveen New York Quality Municipal Income Fund	7.37%	7.67%	6.45%	4.12%	5.27%	4.15%	4.30%	4.06%	4.79%	5.13%	5.74%	5.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NAN and JQC in my portfolio?

NAN and JQC have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NAN or JQC?

JQC has higher volatility (1.77%) compared to NAN (1.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAN dropped -44.96% vs JQC's -75.18%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.