PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NAMFX vs. NAINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NAMFX vs. NAINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Intermediate Bond Fund (NAMFX) and Virtus Tactical Allocation Fund (NAINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAMFX achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly lower than NAINX's 1.80% return. Over the past 10 years, NAMFX has underperformed NAINX with an annualized return of 3.74%, while NAINX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.17% annualized return.


NAMFX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.59%
6M
1.94%
1Y
7.38%
3Y*
6.46%
5Y*
2.50%
10Y*
3.74%

NAINX

1D
0.72%
1M
3.47%
YTD
1.80%
6M
1.57%
1Y
3.38%
3Y*
10.96%
5Y*
2.80%
10Y*
8.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NAMFX vs. NAINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NAMFX
Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Intermediate Bond Fund
1.59%7.83%4.55%8.35%-9.55%0.98%5.92%11.34%-3.69%7.20%
NAINX
Virtus Tactical Allocation Fund
1.80%6.83%14.00%22.38%-28.48%6.63%31.47%28.49%-7.19%19.84%

Correlation

The correlation between NAMFX and NAINX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 1989

0.36

The correlation between NAMFX and NAINX shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.53 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NAMFX vs. NAINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NAMFX
NAMFX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
NAMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
NAMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

NAINX
NAINX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
NAINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAINX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
NAINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAINX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NAMFX vs. NAINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Intermediate Bond Fund (NAMFX) and Virtus Tactical Allocation Fund (NAINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NAMFXNAINXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.38

0.42

+1.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.92

0.66

+3.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.08

+0.44

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

0.37

+2.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.40

1.22

+12.18

NAMFX vs. NAINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAMFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the NAINX Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAMFX and NAINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NAMFXNAINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

0.42

+1.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.21

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.62

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.41

0.60

+0.81

Drawdowns

NAMFX vs. NAINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAMFX drawdown since its inception was -26.56%, smaller than the maximum NAINX drawdown of -36.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAMFX and NAINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NAMFXNAINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.56%

-36.50%

+9.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.57%

-10.19%

+7.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.66%

-11.79%

+8.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.48%

-36.50%

+23.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.16%

-36.50%

+19.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.49%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.53%

-5.27%

+2.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

3.08%

-2.50%

Volatility

NAMFX vs. NAINX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Intermediate Bond Fund (NAMFX) is 1.16%, while Virtus Tactical Allocation Fund (NAINX) has a volatility of 2.66%. This indicates that NAMFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NAINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NAMFXNAINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.16%

2.66%

-1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.46%

7.01%

-4.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.07%

8.81%

-5.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.78%

13.69%

-9.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.01%

13.30%

-9.29%

NAMFX vs. NAINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NAMFX and NAINX have an expense ratio of 1.00%.


Dividends

NAMFX vs. NAINX - Dividend Comparison

NAMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.26%, less than NAINX's 15.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NAINX
Virtus Tactical Allocation Fund
15.81%15.87%13.38%1.94%7.34%7.54%2.06%2.24%4.41%2.61%10.78%7.34%
NAMFX
Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Intermediate Bond Fund
5.26%5.51%5.11%4.57%4.49%2.93%3.53%4.10%4.54%4.30%4.23%4.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


NAMFX and NAINX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NAINX has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to NAMFX (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAMFX dropped -26.56% vs NAINX's -36.50%.

NAMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NAMFX and NAINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer