NAMAX vs. TGVOX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

NAMAX (Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund) and TGVOX (TCW Relative Value Mid Cap Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, NAMAX returned 11.28%/yr vs 12.49%/yr for TGVOX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NAMAX charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for TGVOX.

Performance

NAMAX vs. TGVOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund (NAMAX) and TCW Relative Value Mid Cap Fund (TGVOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAMAX achieves a 23.62% return, which is significantly higher than TGVOX's 20.51% return. Over the past 10 years, NAMAX has underperformed TGVOX with an annualized return of 11.28%, while TGVOX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.49% annualized return.

NAMAX

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 2.21%
• 6M: 18.67%
• YTD: 23.62%
• 1Y: 33.94%
• 3Y*: 18.24%
• 5Y*: 11.91%
• 10Y*: 11.28%

TGVOX

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 0.09%
• 6M: 14.72%
• YTD: 20.51%
• 1Y: 31.69%
• 3Y*: 20.51%
• 5Y*: 11.97%
• 10Y*: 12.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NAMAX vs. TGVOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NAMAX Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund	23.62%	13.77%	13.14%	9.65%	-9.33%	32.28%	6.90%	31.56%	-18.46%	13.71%
TGVOX TCW Relative Value Mid Cap Fund	20.51%	15.53%	17.26%	15.99%	-11.80%	31.99%	3.66%	29.34%	-22.17%	19.74%

Correlation

The correlation between NAMAX and TGVOX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2001	0.94

The correlation between NAMAX and TGVOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NAMAX vs. TGVOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NAMAX

NAMAX Risk / Return Rank: 88
NAMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
NAMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
NAMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
NAMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
NAMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

TGVOX

TGVOX Risk / Return Rank: 83
TGVOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
TGVOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
TGVOX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
TGVOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
TGVOX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NAMAX vs. TGVOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund (NAMAX) and TCW Relative Value Mid Cap Fund (TGVOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NAMAX	TGVOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	2.13	+0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.30	3.02	+0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.37	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.93	3.44	+0.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.30	13.20	+2.10

NAMAX vs. TGVOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAMAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the TGVOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAMAX and TGVOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NAMAX vs. TGVOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAMAX drawdown since its inception was -60.44%, roughly equal to the maximum TGVOX drawdown of -58.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAMAX and TGVOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NAMAX	TGVOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.44%	-58.14%	-2.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.49%	-9.04%	+0.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.90%	-22.69%	+1.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.90%	-23.81%	+2.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.24%	-51.10%	+7.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.39%	-0.28%	-0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.47%	-10.26%	+1.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.18%	2.36%	-0.18%

Volatility

NAMAX vs. TGVOX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund (NAMAX) has a higher volatility of 4.46% compared to TCW Relative Value Mid Cap Fund (TGVOX) at 3.74%. This indicates that NAMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TGVOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NAMAX	TGVOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.46%	3.74%	+0.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.87%	10.78%	+0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.33%	14.62%	-0.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.07%	19.44%	-1.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.99%	22.13%	-2.14%

NAMAX vs. TGVOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NAMAX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than TGVOX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

NAMAX vs. TGVOX - Dividend Comparison

NAMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.03%, less than TGVOX's 18.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NAMAX Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund	6.03%	6.71%	7.07%	0.74%	6.39%	8.99%	3.22%	3.38%	27.38%	21.08%	8.07%	17.05%
TGVOX TCW Relative Value Mid Cap Fund	18.01%	21.70%	9.54%	2.34%	2.54%	12.69%	0.75%	2.43%	9.90%	8.25%	0.56%	16.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NAMAX and TGVOX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, NAMAX and TGVOX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, NAMAX or TGVOX?

NAMAX has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to TGVOX (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAMAX dropped -60.44% vs TGVOX's -58.14%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NAMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.