PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGVOX vs. TGLMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TGVOX vs. TGLMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Relative Value Mid Cap Fund (TGVOX) and TCW Total Return Bond Fund (TGLMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGVOX achieves a 17.10% return, which is significantly higher than TGLMX's 1.25% return. Over the past 10 years, TGVOX has outperformed TGLMX with an annualized return of 12.42%, while TGLMX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.53% annualized return.


TGVOX

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.10%
YTD
17.10%
6M
19.76%
1Y
35.91%
3Y*
21.79%
5Y*
10.29%
10Y*
12.42%

TGLMX

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.13%
YTD
1.25%
6M
1.28%
1Y
7.15%
3Y*
4.76%
5Y*
-0.13%
10Y*
1.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TGVOX vs. TGLMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TGVOX
TCW Relative Value Mid Cap Fund
17.10%15.53%17.26%15.99%-11.80%31.99%3.66%29.34%-22.17%19.74%
TGLMX
TCW Total Return Bond Fund
1.25%8.99%1.82%5.05%-16.59%-1.05%8.32%7.28%0.80%3.44%

Correlation

The correlation between TGVOX and TGLMX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1998

-0.16

The correlation between TGVOX and TGLMX shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TGVOX vs. TGLMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGVOX
TGVOX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
TGVOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGVOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGVOX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
TGVOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGVOX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

TGLMX
TGLMX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
TGLMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGLMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGLMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
TGLMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGLMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGVOX vs. TGLMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Relative Value Mid Cap Fund (TGVOX) and TCW Total Return Bond Fund (TGLMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TGVOXTGLMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.52

1.57

+0.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.49

2.38

+1.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.29

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.94

2.72

+1.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.19

8.30

+6.89

TGVOX vs. TGLMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGVOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the TGLMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGVOX and TGLMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TGVOXTGLMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

1.57

+0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

-0.02

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.28

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.40

+0.04

Drawdowns

TGVOX vs. TGLMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGVOX drawdown since its inception was -58.14%, which is greater than TGLMX's maximum drawdown of -22.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGVOX and TGLMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TGVOXTGLMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.14%

-22.26%

-35.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.04%

-2.63%

-6.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.69%

-8.56%

-14.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.81%

-22.17%

-1.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.10%

-22.26%

-28.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-2.72%

+1.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.30%

-3.80%

-6.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

0.86%

+1.48%

Volatility

TGVOX vs. TGLMX - Volatility Comparison

TCW Relative Value Mid Cap Fund (TGVOX) has a higher volatility of 3.91% compared to TCW Total Return Bond Fund (TGLMX) at 1.44%. This indicates that TGVOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TGLMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TGVOXTGLMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.91%

1.44%

+2.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.86%

3.00%

+7.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.43%

4.40%

+10.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.55%

7.05%

+12.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.30%

5.59%

+16.71%

TGVOX vs. TGLMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGVOX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than TGLMX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

TGVOX vs. TGLMX - Dividend Comparison

TGVOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.53%, more than TGLMX's 6.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TGLMX
TCW Total Return Bond Fund
6.74%7.19%6.52%6.13%3.27%2.08%3.37%4.07%3.55%2.89%4.13%2.88%
TGVOX
TCW Relative Value Mid Cap Fund
18.53%21.70%9.54%2.34%2.54%12.69%0.75%2.43%9.90%8.25%0.56%16.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


TGVOX and TGLMX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TGVOX has higher volatility (3.91%) compared to TGLMX (1.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGVOX dropped -58.14% vs TGLMX's -22.26%.

TGVOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGVOX and TGLMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer