PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NALFX vs. RNPGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NALFX vs. RNPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in New Alternatives Fund (NALFX) and American Funds New Perspective Fund Class R-6 (RNPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NALFX achieves a 19.18% return, which is significantly higher than RNPGX's 7.51% return. Over the past 10 years, NALFX has underperformed RNPGX with an annualized return of 10.92%, while RNPGX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.90% annualized return.


NALFX

1D
1.25%
1M
3.67%
YTD
19.18%
6M
20.44%
1Y
32.39%
3Y*
10.98%
5Y*
3.35%
10Y*
10.92%

RNPGX

1D
0.11%
1M
5.24%
YTD
7.51%
6M
8.61%
1Y
20.87%
3Y*
19.00%
5Y*
9.30%
10Y*
13.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NALFX vs. RNPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NALFX
New Alternatives Fund
19.18%28.13%-6.03%-2.49%-15.87%-4.78%61.74%36.98%-6.91%21.24%
RNPGX
American Funds New Perspective Fund Class R-6
7.51%21.71%17.13%25.06%-25.70%18.00%33.88%31.22%-5.71%29.31%

Correlation

The correlation between NALFX and RNPGX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.71

The correlation between NALFX and RNPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NALFX vs. RNPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NALFX
NALFX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
NALFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NALFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
NALFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
NALFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
NALFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

RNPGX
RNPGX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
RNPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
RNPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NALFX vs. RNPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for New Alternatives Fund (NALFX) and American Funds New Perspective Fund Class R-6 (RNPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NALFXRNPGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.29

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.47

1.84

+2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.35

7.76

+5.60

NALFX vs. RNPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NALFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the RNPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NALFX and RNPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NALFXRNPGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

1.57

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.54

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.78

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.69

-0.26

Drawdowns

NALFX vs. RNPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NALFX drawdown since its inception was -59.67%, which is greater than RNPGX's maximum drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NALFX and RNPGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NALFXRNPGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.67%

-34.25%

-25.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-11.44%

+3.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.52%

-17.90%

-6.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.03%

-34.25%

-3.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.35%

-34.25%

-8.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

0.00%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.84%

-5.55%

-9.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

2.70%

-0.18%

Volatility

NALFX vs. RNPGX - Volatility Comparison

New Alternatives Fund (NALFX) has a higher volatility of 5.44% compared to American Funds New Perspective Fund Class R-6 (RNPGX) at 3.93%. This indicates that NALFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RNPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NALFXRNPGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.44%

3.93%

+1.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.93%

10.80%

+1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.79%

13.40%

+1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.82%

17.21%

+0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

17.83%

+0.20%

NALFX vs. RNPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NALFX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than RNPGX's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

NALFX vs. RNPGX - Dividend Comparison

NALFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than RNPGX's 6.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NALFX
New Alternatives Fund
0.98%1.17%2.04%4.47%4.63%5.14%4.93%5.55%6.62%4.16%3.71%1.71%
RNPGX
American Funds New Perspective Fund Class R-6
6.39%6.87%5.45%5.67%4.53%7.31%4.41%4.47%7.95%5.80%4.20%6.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


NALFX and RNPGX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NALFX has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to RNPGX (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NALFX dropped -59.67% vs RNPGX's -34.25%.

NALFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NALFX and RNPGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer