PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NALFX vs. FIQOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NALFX vs. FIQOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in New Alternatives Fund (NALFX) and Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class Z (FIQOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NALFX achieves a 19.18% return, which is significantly lower than FIQOX's 20.83% return.


NALFX

1D
1.25%
1M
3.67%
YTD
19.18%
6M
20.44%
1Y
32.39%
3Y*
10.98%
5Y*
3.35%
10Y*
10.92%

FIQOX

1D
1.12%
1M
8.04%
YTD
20.83%
6M
21.10%
1Y
41.26%
3Y*
31.34%
5Y*
15.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NALFX vs. FIQOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
NALFX
New Alternatives Fund
19.18%28.13%-6.03%-2.49%-15.87%-4.78%61.74%36.98%-1.81%
FIQOX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class Z
20.83%16.27%46.05%25.10%-25.64%18.58%31.08%29.13%-10.40%

Correlation

The correlation between NALFX and FIQOX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018

0.64

The correlation between NALFX and FIQOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (3 years) to 0.68 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NALFX vs. FIQOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NALFX
NALFX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
NALFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NALFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
NALFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
NALFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
NALFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

FIQOX
FIQOX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FIQOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIQOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIQOX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FIQOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIQOX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NALFX vs. FIQOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for New Alternatives Fund (NALFX) and Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class Z (FIQOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NALFXFIQOXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.28

2.42

-0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.04

3.20

-0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.43

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.47

3.59

+0.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.35

15.53

-2.18

NALFX vs. FIQOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NALFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the FIQOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NALFX and FIQOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NALFXFIQOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.42

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.79

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.83

-0.40

Drawdowns

NALFX vs. FIQOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NALFX drawdown since its inception was -59.67%, which is greater than FIQOX's maximum drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NALFX and FIQOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NALFXFIQOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.67%

-33.64%

-26.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-11.74%

+4.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.52%

-22.59%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.03%

-33.64%

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

0.00%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.84%

-7.86%

-6.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

2.71%

-0.19%

Volatility

NALFX vs. FIQOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for New Alternatives Fund (NALFX) is 5.44%, while Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class Z (FIQOX) has a volatility of 6.04%. This indicates that NALFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIQOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NALFXFIQOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.44%

6.04%

-0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.93%

13.72%

-1.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.79%

17.39%

-2.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.82%

20.02%

-2.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

21.18%

-3.15%

NALFX vs. FIQOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NALFX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than FIQOX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

NALFX vs. FIQOX - Dividend Comparison

NALFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than FIQOX's 9.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIQOX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class Z
9.60%11.60%26.02%1.10%6.51%12.99%8.23%5.09%9.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NALFX
New Alternatives Fund
0.98%1.17%2.04%4.47%4.63%5.14%4.93%5.55%6.62%4.16%3.71%1.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


NALFX and FIQOX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIQOX has higher volatility (6.04%) compared to NALFX (5.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NALFX dropped -59.67% vs FIQOX's -33.64%.

FIQOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NALFX and FIQOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer