PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NALFX vs. BGAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NALFX vs. BGAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in New Alternatives Fund (NALFX) and Baron Global Advantage Fund (BGAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NALFX achieves a 17.77% return, which is significantly lower than BGAIX's 19.81% return. Over the past 10 years, NALFX has underperformed BGAIX with an annualized return of 10.91%, while BGAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.49% annualized return.


NALFX

1D
1.54%
1M
0.27%
YTD
17.77%
6M
17.61%
1Y
30.18%
3Y*
9.77%
5Y*
3.13%
10Y*
10.91%

BGAIX

1D
0.53%
1M
13.22%
YTD
19.81%
6M
18.74%
1Y
45.49%
3Y*
26.39%
5Y*
1.90%
10Y*
16.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NALFX vs. BGAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NALFX
New Alternatives Fund
17.77%28.13%-6.03%-2.49%-15.87%-4.78%61.74%36.98%-6.91%21.24%
BGAIX
Baron Global Advantage Fund
19.81%27.53%26.42%25.56%-51.56%0.90%79.46%45.45%-3.66%49.82%

Correlation

The correlation between NALFX and BGAIX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2012

0.55

The correlation between NALFX and BGAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NALFX vs. BGAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NALFX
NALFX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
NALFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NALFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
NALFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
NALFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
NALFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

BGAIX
BGAIX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BGAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
BGAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NALFX vs. BGAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for New Alternatives Fund (NALFX) and Baron Global Advantage Fund (BGAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NALFXBGAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.38

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.97

4.19

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.61

13.28

-1.67

NALFX vs. BGAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NALFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the BGAIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NALFX and BGAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NALFX vs. BGAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NALFX drawdown since its inception was -59.67%, roughly equal to the maximum BGAIX drawdown of -61.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NALFX and BGAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NALFXBGAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.67%

-61.14%

+1.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-10.69%

+3.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.35%

-26.52%

+2.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.03%

-61.14%

+23.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.35%

-61.14%

+18.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-2.45%

+1.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.82%

-16.99%

+2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

3.36%

-0.79%

Volatility

NALFX vs. BGAIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for New Alternatives Fund (NALFX) is 4.92%, while Baron Global Advantage Fund (BGAIX) has a volatility of 9.94%. This indicates that NALFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NALFXBGAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.92%

9.94%

-5.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.47%

15.53%

-3.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.11%

22.32%

-7.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.87%

30.37%

-12.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.04%

26.86%

-8.82%

NALFX vs. BGAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NALFX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than BGAIX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

NALFX vs. BGAIX - Dividend Comparison

NALFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than BGAIX's 0.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGAIX
Baron Global Advantage Fund
0.16%0.19%0.00%0.00%1.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.42%
NALFX
New Alternatives Fund
0.99%1.17%2.04%4.47%4.63%5.14%4.93%5.55%6.62%4.16%3.71%1.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


NALFX and BGAIX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BGAIX has higher volatility (9.94%) compared to NALFX (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NALFX dropped -59.67% vs BGAIX's -61.14%.

BGAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NALFX and BGAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer