PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NAK vs. QS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NAK vs. QS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK) and QuantumScape Corporation (QS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAK achieves a 3.55% return, which is significantly higher than QS's -31.96% return.


NAK

1D
4.62%
1M
-9.33%
YTD
3.55%
6M
-5.12%
1Y
65.85%
3Y*
109.20%
5Y*
29.51%
10Y*
20.01%

QS

1D
-1.94%
1M
-18.13%
YTD
-31.96%
6M
-39.92%
1Y
57.91%
3Y*
-1.86%
5Y*
-23.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NAK vs. QS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
NAK
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.
3.55%238.78%79.86%46.42%-32.31%1.30%-78.68%
QS
QuantumScape Corporation
-31.96%100.77%-25.32%22.57%-74.45%-73.72%757.36%

Correlation

The correlation between NAK and QS is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2020

0.23

The correlation between NAK and QS shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (3 years) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NAK:

$1.12B

QS:

$4.33B

EPS

NAK:

-CA$0.19

QS:

-$0.72

PB Ratio

NAK:

88.47

QS:

3.90

Total Revenue (TTM)

NAK:

CA$0.00

QS:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

NAK:

-CA$85.85K

QS:

-$49.03M

EBITDA (TTM)

NAK:

-CA$99.80M

QS:

-$378.92M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NAK vs. QS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NAK
NAK Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
NAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAK Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
NAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAK Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

QS
QS Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
QS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QS Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
QS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QS Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NAK vs. QS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK) and QuantumScape Corporation (QS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NAKQSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.19

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

0.86

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.67

1.33

+0.34

NAK vs. QS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAK Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is comparable to the QS Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAK and QS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NAK vs. QS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAK drawdown since its inception was -99.01%, roughly equal to the maximum QS drawdown of -97.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAK and QS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NAKQSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.01%

-97.36%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.68%

-67.68%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.68%

-73.93%

+6.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.68%

-91.45%

+23.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.32%

-94.62%

+4.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.93%

-85.52%

+11.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.60%

43.64%

-4.04%

Volatility

NAK vs. QS - Volatility Comparison

Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK) and QuantumScape Corporation (QS) have volatilities of 26.03% and 25.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NAKQSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.03%

25.60%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

77.41%

48.92%

+28.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

115.33%

103.22%

+12.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

83.81%

85.76%

-1.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

97.90%

105.87%

-7.97%

Dividends

NAK vs. QS - Dividend Comparison

Neither NAK nor QS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

NAK vs. QS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. and QuantumScape Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002022202320242025202600
(NAK) Total Revenue
(QS) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. NAK values in CAD, QS values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


NAK and QS have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NAK has higher volatility (26.03%) compared to QS (25.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAK dropped -99.01% vs QS's -97.36%.

NAK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NAK and QS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer