NAINX vs. PSTAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NAINX (Virtus Tactical Allocation Fund) and PSTAX (Virtus KAR Capital Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - NAINX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Virtus, while PSTAX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Virtus. Over the past 10 years, NAINX returned 8.17%/yr vs 13.73%/yr for PSTAX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NAINX charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.20%/yr for PSTAX.

Performance

NAINX vs. PSTAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Tactical Allocation Fund (NAINX) and Virtus KAR Capital Growth Fund (PSTAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAINX achieves a 1.80% return, which is significantly lower than PSTAX's 7.63% return. Over the past 10 years, NAINX has underperformed PSTAX with an annualized return of 8.17%, while PSTAX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.73% annualized return.

NAINX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 3.91%
• YTD: 1.80%
• 6M: 1.38%
• 1Y: 3.28%
• 3Y*: 10.96%
• 5Y*: 2.97%
• 10Y*: 8.17%

PSTAX

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 11.00%
• YTD: 7.63%
• 6M: 5.82%
• 1Y: 10.30%
• 3Y*: 17.97%
• 5Y*: 7.04%
• 10Y*: 13.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NAINX vs. PSTAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NAINX Virtus Tactical Allocation Fund	1.80%	6.83%	14.00%	22.38%	-28.48%	6.63%	31.47%	28.49%	-7.19%	19.84%
PSTAX Virtus KAR Capital Growth Fund	7.63%	6.85%	25.19%	34.35%	-35.74%	11.70%	46.13%	42.83%	-8.07%	35.13%

Correlation

The correlation between NAINX and PSTAX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1996	0.89

The correlation between NAINX and PSTAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NAINX vs. PSTAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NAINX

NAINX Risk / Return Rank: 5
NAINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
NAINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
NAINX Omega Ratio Rank: 5
NAINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
NAINX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

PSTAX

PSTAX Risk / Return Rank: 7
PSTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
PSTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
PSTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
PSTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
PSTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NAINX vs. PSTAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Tactical Allocation Fund (NAINX) and Virtus KAR Capital Growth Fund (PSTAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NAINX	PSTAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.39	0.64	-0.25
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.61	1.00	-0.39
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.12	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.33	0.55	-0.22
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.10	1.72	-0.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NAINX vs. PSTAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAINX Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the PSTAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAINX and PSTAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NAINX	PSTAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39	0.64	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22	0.28	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62	0.58	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.34	+0.26

Drawdowns

NAINX vs. PSTAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAINX drawdown since its inception was -36.50%, smaller than the maximum PSTAX drawdown of -76.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAINX and PSTAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NAINX	PSTAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.50%	-76.37%	+39.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.19%	-19.58%	+9.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.79%	-29.63%	+17.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.50%	-44.54%	+8.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.50%	-44.54%	+8.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.49%	-3.53%	+3.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.27%	-31.92%	+26.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.08%	6.25%	-3.17%

Volatility

NAINX vs. PSTAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Tactical Allocation Fund (NAINX) is 2.67%, while Virtus KAR Capital Growth Fund (PSTAX) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that NAINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSTAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NAINX	PSTAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.67%	5.47%	-2.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.00%	13.60%	-6.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.79%	16.84%	-8.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.69%	25.19%	-11.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.30%	23.66%	-10.36%

NAINX vs. PSTAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NAINX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than PSTAX's 1.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

NAINX vs. PSTAX - Dividend Comparison

NAINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.81%, more than PSTAX's 7.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NAINX Virtus Tactical Allocation Fund	15.81%	15.87%	13.38%	1.94%	7.34%	7.54%	2.06%	2.24%	4.41%	2.61%	10.78%	7.34%
PSTAX Virtus KAR Capital Growth Fund	7.04%	7.58%	14.19%	6.07%	23.19%	7.73%	3.15%	2.71%	11.57%	6.28%	8.98%	4.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NAINX and PSTAX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, NAINX and PSTAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, NAINX or PSTAX?

PSTAX has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to NAINX (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAINX dropped -36.50% vs PSTAX's -76.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSTAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.