NAIL vs. MULL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NAIL (Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shares) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. NAIL is passively managed, while MULL is actively managed. Over the past year, NAIL returned -20.27% vs 6074.28% for MULL. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NAIL charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.

Performance

NAIL vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shares (NAIL) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAIL achieves a -23.44% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 936.86% return.

NAIL

• 1D: -2.39%
• 1M: 1.50%
• YTD: -23.44%
• 6M: -42.68%
• 1Y: -20.27%
• 3Y*: -11.78%
• 5Y*: -14.07%
• 10Y*: 3.96%

MULL

• 1D: 2.92%
• 1M: 216.81%
• YTD: 936.86%
• 6M: 1,369.93%
• 1Y: 6,074.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NAIL vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NAIL Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shares	-23.44%	-40.43%	-35.51%
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	936.86%	558.51%	-40.10%

Correlation

The correlation between NAIL and MULL is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2024	0.21

NAIL vs. MULL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NAIL	MULL
Consumer Cyclical	71.8%	-
Industrials	19.1%	-
Basic Materials	8.6%	-
Real Estate	0.5%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Technology	-	66.7%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

NAIL vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NAIL

NAIL Risk / Return Rank: 7
NAIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
NAIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
NAIL Omega Ratio Rank: 9
NAIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
NAIL Martin Ratio Rank: 6

MULL

MULL Risk / Return Rank: 99
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 97
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NAIL vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shares (NAIL) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NAIL	MULL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.23	46.71	-46.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.27	7.02	-6.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.89	-0.86
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.30	116.34	-116.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.53	390.40	-390.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NAIL vs. MULL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAIL Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the MULL Sharpe Ratio of 46.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAIL and MULL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NAIL	MULL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.23	46.71	-46.94
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.16	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.00	7.45	-7.45

Drawdowns

NAIL vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAIL drawdown since its inception was -93.75%, which is greater than MULL's maximum drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAIL and MULL.

Drawdown Indicators

	NAIL	MULL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.75%	-72.29%	-21.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-67.85%	-53.09%	-14.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-82.09%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-84.40%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-93.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-78.12%	0.00%	-78.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.80%	-20.62%	-23.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	38.18%	15.79%	+22.39%

Volatility

NAIL vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shares (NAIL) is 24.23%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a volatility of 55.41%. This indicates that NAIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MULL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NAIL	MULL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.23%	55.41%	-31.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	60.86%	105.59%	-44.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	87.63%	132.38%	-44.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	86.99%	136.22%	-49.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	89.20%	136.22%	-47.02%

NAIL vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

NAIL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

NAIL vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

NAIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than MULL's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	0.04%	0.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NAIL Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shares	1.04%	1.55%	0.63%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	0.17%	0.35%	1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NAIL and MULL in my portfolio?

NAIL and MULL have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NAIL or MULL?

MULL has higher volatility (55.41%) compared to NAIL (24.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAIL dropped -93.75% vs MULL's -72.29%.

Which ETF is better, NAIL or MULL?

On 1-year performance, MULL leads with 6074.28% vs -20.27% for NAIL. On fees, NAIL is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, NAIL has been the lower-risk option at 24.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NAIL or MULL?

Over the 1-year period, MULL has performed better with a 6074.28% return vs -20.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NAIL or MULL?

NAIL is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NAIL or MULL?

NAIL has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.04% for MULL.

What is the main difference between NAIL and MULL?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NAIL and 1.50% for MULL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (46.71 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.