PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NAIL vs. LABU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NAIL vs. LABU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shares (NAIL) and Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAIL achieves a -14.74% return, which is significantly lower than LABU's 6.64% return. Over the past 10 years, NAIL has outperformed LABU with an annualized return of 4.93%, while LABU has yielded a comparatively lower -12.12% annualized return.


NAIL

1D
11.51%
1M
7.40%
YTD
-14.74%
6M
-22.02%
1Y
-15.84%
3Y*
-10.68%
5Y*
-9.80%
10Y*
4.93%

LABU

1D
6.80%
1M
-10.49%
YTD
6.64%
6M
8.23%
1Y
184.28%
3Y*
7.22%
5Y*
-35.06%
10Y*
-12.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NAIL vs. LABU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NAIL
Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shares
-14.74%-40.43%-22.83%259.61%-75.23%168.20%-32.08%184.63%-73.96%268.71%
LABU
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares
6.64%79.17%-26.02%-13.41%-80.36%-64.15%74.66%75.50%-57.61%149.12%

Correlation

The correlation between NAIL and LABU is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2015

0.41

The correlation between NAIL and LABU shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NAIL vs. LABU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NAIL
LABU

Consumer Cyclical

71.8%

-

Industrials

19.1%

-

Basic Materials

8.6%
0.0%

Real Estate

0.5%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

99.8%

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

NAIL
71.8%
LABU

-

Industrials

NAIL
19.1%
LABU

-

Basic Materials

NAIL
8.6%
LABU
0.0%

Real Estate

NAIL
0.5%
LABU

-

Communication Services

NAIL

-

LABU

-

Consumer Defensive

NAIL

-

LABU

-

Energy

NAIL

-

LABU

-

Financial Services

NAIL

-

LABU
0.2%

Healthcare

NAIL

-

LABU
99.8%

Technology

NAIL

-

LABU

-

Utilities

NAIL

-

LABU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NAIL vs. LABU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NAIL
NAIL Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
NAIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAIL Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
NAIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAIL Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

LABU
LABU Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
LABU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LABU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
LABU Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
LABU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
LABU Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NAIL vs. LABU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shares (NAIL) and Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NAILLABUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.33

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.23

6.04

-6.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.41

17.12

-17.52

NAIL vs. LABU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAIL Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the LABU Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAIL and LABU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NAILLABUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

2.41

-2.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

-0.37

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

-0.13

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

-0.23

+0.24

Drawdowns

NAIL vs. LABU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAIL drawdown since its inception was -93.75%, smaller than the maximum LABU drawdown of -99.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAIL and LABU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NAILLABUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.75%

-99.18%

+5.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.85%

-30.70%

-37.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-82.09%

-78.30%

-3.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.40%

-97.59%

+13.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.75%

-98.96%

+5.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-75.64%

-96.24%

+20.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.83%

-81.67%

+37.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.90%

10.81%

+28.09%

Volatility

NAIL vs. LABU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shares (NAIL) is 23.86%, while Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) has a volatility of 29.37%. This indicates that NAIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LABU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NAILLABUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.86%

29.37%

-5.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.34%

60.90%

+0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

88.05%

77.11%

+10.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

87.10%

95.62%

-8.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

89.26%

95.44%

-6.18%

NAIL vs. LABU - Expense Ratio Comparison

NAIL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than LABU's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

NAIL vs. LABU - Dividend Comparison

NAIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, more than LABU's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
LABU
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares
0.72%0.84%0.35%0.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.28%0.64%0.17%
NAIL
Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shares
0.93%1.55%0.63%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.17%0.35%1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


NAIL and LABU have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LABU has higher volatility (29.37%) compared to NAIL (23.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAIL dropped -93.75% vs LABU's -99.18%.

On 10-year performance, NAIL leads with 4.93% vs -12.12% for LABU. On fees, NAIL is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, NAIL has been the lower-risk option at 23.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, NAIL has performed better with a 4.93% return vs -12.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NAIL is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for LABU.

NAIL has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.72% for LABU.

NAIL tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index (300%), while LABU tracks S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NAIL and 1.12% for LABU.

LABU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NAIL and LABU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer