NAIL vs. FAS
NAIL (Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shares) and FAS (Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - NAIL tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index (300%) while FAS tracks the Financial Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NAIL returned 3.21%/yr vs 21.90%/yr for FAS. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NAIL charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for FAS.
Performance
NAIL vs. FAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NAIL achieves a -16.63% return, which is significantly lower than FAS's 0.79% return. Over the past 10 years, NAIL has underperformed FAS with an annualized return of 3.21%, while FAS has yielded a comparatively higher 21.90% annualized return.
NAIL
- 1D
- 2.44%
- 1M
- -4.01%
- 6M
- -41.20%
- YTD
- -16.63%
- 1Y
- -31.84%
- 3Y*
- -20.84%
- 5Y*
- -9.46%
- 10Y*
- 3.21%
FAS
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 16.51%
- 6M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 1Y
- 8.44%
- 3Y*
- 41.60%
- 5Y*
- 12.52%
- 10Y*
- 21.90%
NAIL vs. FAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NAIL Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shares | -16.63% | -40.43% | -22.83% | 259.61% | -75.23% | 168.20% | -32.08% | 184.63% | -73.96% | 268.71% |
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF | 0.79% | 21.48% | 84.47% | 14.92% | -43.19% | 116.59% | -34.97% | 113.04% | -33.84% | 67.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between NAIL and FAS is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2015 | 0.53 |
The correlation between NAIL and FAS shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NAIL vs. FAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NAIL
FAS
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
NAIL
FAS
-
Industrials
NAIL
FAS
Basic Materials
NAIL
FAS
-
Real Estate
NAIL
FAS
-
Communication Services
NAIL
-
FAS
-
Consumer Defensive
NAIL
-
FAS
-
Energy
NAIL
-
FAS
-
Financial Services
NAIL
-
FAS
Healthcare
NAIL
-
FAS
-
Technology
NAIL
-
FAS
Utilities
NAIL
-
FAS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NAIL vs. FAS — Risk / Return Rank
NAIL
FAS
NAIL vs. FAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shares (NAIL) and Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF (FAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NAIL | FAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.07 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 0.21 | -0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.76 | 0.46 | -1.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NAIL vs. FAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NAIL drawdown since its inception was -93.75%, roughly equal to the maximum FAS drawdown of -91.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAIL and FAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NAIL | FAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.75% | -91.61% | -2.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.85% | -40.88% | -26.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.09% | -43.10% | -38.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.40% | -66.88% | -17.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.75% | -85.99% | -7.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.18% | -7.52% | -68.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.08% | -31.04% | -13.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 41.98% | 18.43% | +23.55% |
Volatility
NAIL vs. FAS - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shares (NAIL) has a higher volatility of 28.94% compared to Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF (FAS) at 12.74%. This indicates that NAIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NAIL | FAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.94% | 12.74% | +16.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 63.56% | 33.88% | +29.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 89.78% | 43.76% | +46.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 87.93% | 55.22% | +32.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 89.63% | 61.09% | +28.54% |
NAIL vs. FAS - Expense Ratio Comparison
NAIL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FAS's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
NAIL vs. FAS - Dividend Comparison
NAIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than FAS's 8.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF | 8.33% | 8.21% | 0.76% | 1.77% | 0.91% | 0.60% | 0.47% | 0.62% | 1.43% | 0.11% |
NAIL Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shares | 0.75% | 1.55% | 0.63% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.17% | 0.35% | 1.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NAIL and FAS have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NAIL has higher volatility (28.94%) compared to FAS (12.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAIL dropped -93.75% vs FAS's -91.61%.
On 10-year performance, FAS leads with 21.90% vs 3.21% for NAIL. On fees, FAS is cheaper at 0.88% per year. On volatility, FAS has been the lower-risk option at 12.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FAS has performed better with a 21.90% return vs 3.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FAS is cheaper with a 0.88% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NAIL.
FAS has the higher dividend yield at 8.33%, compared with 0.75% for NAIL.
NAIL tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index (300%), while FAS tracks Financial Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NAIL and 0.88% for FAS.
FAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.19 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NAIL and FAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer