NAD vs. BMEZ

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

NAD (Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund) and BMEZ (BlackRock Health Sciences Trust II) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — NAD in Asset Management, BMEZ in Capital Markets. Over the past 5 years, NAD returned -0.34%/yr vs -3.85%/yr for BMEZ. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NAD vs. BMEZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAD) and BlackRock Health Sciences Trust II (BMEZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAD achieves a 0.07% return, which is significantly higher than BMEZ's -1.89% return.

NAD

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: -1.67%
• YTD: 0.07%
• 6M: -0.34%
• 1Y: 12.30%
• 3Y*: 8.43%
• 5Y*: -0.34%
• 10Y*: 2.62%

BMEZ

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: 1.06%
• YTD: -1.89%
• 6M: -3.49%
• 1Y: 6.83%
• 3Y*: 6.74%
• 5Y*: -3.85%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NAD vs. BMEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
NAD Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund	0.07%	11.29%	8.74%	1.26%	-22.85%	9.70%	7.07%
BMEZ BlackRock Health Sciences Trust II	-1.89%	18.69%	9.54%	5.07%	-32.65%	-6.00%	48.77%

Correlation

The correlation between NAD and BMEZ is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.28
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2020	0.29

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) NAD : $410.48M BMEZ : $58.97M
Gross Profit (TTM) NAD : $385.55M BMEZ : $52.95M
EBITDA (TTM) NAD : $744.52M BMEZ : $43.53M

Return for Risk

NAD vs. BMEZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NAD

NAD Risk / Return Rank: 74
NAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
NAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
NAD Omega Ratio Rank: 72
NAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
NAD Martin Ratio Rank: 80

BMEZ

BMEZ Risk / Return Rank: 54
BMEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
BMEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
BMEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 47
BMEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
BMEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NAD vs. BMEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAD) and BlackRock Health Sciences Trust II (BMEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NAD	BMEZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.14	0.45	+0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	0.80	+0.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.09	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.53	0.61	+0.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.03	1.51	+4.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NAD vs. BMEZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAD Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is higher than the BMEZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAD and BMEZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NAD	BMEZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.14	0.45	+0.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.03	-0.19	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.16	+0.22

Drawdowns

NAD vs. BMEZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAD drawdown since its inception was -44.65%, roughly equal to the maximum BMEZ drawdown of -46.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAD and BMEZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	NAD	BMEZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.65%	-46.19%	+1.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.08%	-11.24%	+3.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.69%	-18.41%	+3.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.58%	-46.17%	+10.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.89%	-21.30%	+15.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.82%	-24.16%	+16.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.05%	4.56%	-2.51%

Volatility

NAD vs. BMEZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAD) is 3.22%, while BlackRock Health Sciences Trust II (BMEZ) has a volatility of 5.13%. This indicates that NAD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMEZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NAD	BMEZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.22%	5.13%	-1.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.26%	11.52%	-2.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.88%	15.28%	-4.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.61%	19.91%	-8.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.93%	24.15%	-12.22%

Dividends

NAD vs. BMEZ - Dividend Comparison

NAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.37%, less than BMEZ's 10.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BMEZ BlackRock Health Sciences Trust II	10.86%	12.43%	11.74%	10.80%	11.28%	6.51%	3.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NAD Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund	7.37%	7.37%	6.63%	4.13%	5.58%	4.43%	4.41%	4.40%	5.37%	5.42%	6.05%	5.96%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NAD and BMEZ in my portfolio?

NAD and BMEZ have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NAD or BMEZ?

BMEZ has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to NAD (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAD dropped -44.65% vs BMEZ's -46.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NAD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.