NACP vs. QWLD

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NACP (Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF) and QWLD (SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - NACP tracks the Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index while QWLD tracks the MSCI World Factor Mix A-Series (USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NACP returned 16.01%/yr vs 10.08%/yr for QWLD. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NACP charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for QWLD.

Performance

NACP vs. QWLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) and SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NACP achieves a 22.35% return, which is significantly higher than QWLD's 7.11% return.

NACP

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 8.57%
• YTD: 22.35%
• 6M: 21.44%
• 1Y: 44.11%
• 3Y*: 27.38%
• 5Y*: 16.01%
• 10Y*: —

QWLD

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 2.38%
• YTD: 7.11%
• 6M: 7.83%
• 1Y: 17.61%
• 3Y*: 16.69%
• 5Y*: 10.08%
• 10Y*: 11.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NACP vs. QWLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
NACP Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF	22.35%	21.38%	23.93%	29.69%	-23.05%	27.62%	26.00%	30.74%	-8.79%
QWLD SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF	7.11%	17.93%	14.44%	19.59%	-13.30%	21.57%	10.24%	27.59%	-9.13%

Correlation

The correlation between NACP and QWLD is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2018	0.87

The correlation between NACP and QWLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NACP vs. QWLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NACP	QWLD
Technology	35.8%	22.3%
Consumer Cyclical	11.1%	5.0%
Financial Services	10.6%	13.8%
Communication Services	9.8%	9.6%
Healthcare	9.2%	12.6%
Industrials	8.7%	8.6%
Energy	5.0%	4.5%
Consumer Defensive	3.6%	7.6%
Utilities	3.4%	3.7%
Basic Materials	1.5%	2.9%
Real Estate	1.3%	0.8%

Return for Risk

NACP vs. QWLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NACP

NACP Risk / Return Rank: 89
NACP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
NACP Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
NACP Omega Ratio Rank: 88
NACP Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
NACP Martin Ratio Rank: 90

QWLD

QWLD Risk / Return Rank: 53
QWLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
QWLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
QWLD Omega Ratio Rank: 52
QWLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
QWLD Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NACP vs. QWLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) and SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NACP	QWLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.16	1.82	+1.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.19	2.62	+1.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.32	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.59	2.31	+2.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.18	9.99	+10.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NACP vs. QWLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NACP Sharpe Ratio is 3.16, which is higher than the QWLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NACP and QWLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NACP	QWLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.16	1.82	+1.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92	0.75	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.77	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.93	0.70	+0.23

Drawdowns

NACP vs. QWLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NACP drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, roughly equal to the maximum QWLD drawdown of -31.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NACP and QWLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	NACP	QWLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.96%	-31.89%	+0.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.65%	-7.66%	-1.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.66%	-12.40%	-7.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.89%	-22.84%	-5.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.03%	+0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.75%	-3.70%	-2.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.19%	1.77%	+0.42%

Volatility

NACP vs. QWLD - Volatility Comparison

Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD) at 2.23%. This indicates that NACP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QWLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NACP	QWLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.34%	2.23%	+2.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.13%	7.52%	+3.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.02%	9.69%	+4.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.47%	13.52%	+3.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.69%	15.18%	+3.51%

NACP vs. QWLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

NACP has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than QWLD's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

NACP vs. QWLD - Dividend Comparison

NACP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than QWLD's 1.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NACP Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF	0.55%	0.62%	2.96%	1.28%	3.48%	3.06%	1.48%	1.22%	0.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QWLD SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF	1.83%	1.85%	1.74%	1.78%	2.02%	1.77%	1.77%	2.13%	2.33%	2.73%	2.22%	3.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NACP and QWLD in my portfolio?

NACP and QWLD have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NACP or QWLD?

NACP has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to QWLD (2.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NACP dropped -30.96% vs QWLD's -31.89%.

Which ETF is better, NACP or QWLD?

On 5-year performance, NACP leads with 16.01% vs 10.08% for QWLD. On fees, QWLD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, QWLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NACP or QWLD?

Over the 5-year period, NACP has performed better with a 16.01% return vs 10.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NACP or QWLD?

QWLD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for NACP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NACP or QWLD?

QWLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.55% for NACP.

What is the main difference between NACP and QWLD?

NACP tracks Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index, while QWLD tracks MSCI World Factor Mix A-Series (USD). They also come from different issuers: Impact Shares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for NACP and 0.30% for QWLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NACP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.