PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NACP vs. QARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NACP vs. QARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NACP achieves a 23.11% return, which is significantly higher than QARP's 15.30% return.


NACP

1D
1.91%
1M
1.87%
6M
17.57%
YTD
23.11%
1Y
39.51%
3Y*
25.34%
5Y*
14.99%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.03%

QARP

1D
1.03%
1M
3.67%
6M
10.06%
YTD
15.30%
1Y
26.81%
3Y*
18.24%
5Y*
12.12%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$185.97K$133.29K$157.63K
$112.54K$118.75K$179.32K

NACP vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
NACP
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF
23.11%21.38%23.93%29.69%-23.05%27.62%26.00%30.74%-8.79%
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
15.30%13.99%18.94%23.03%-14.62%31.82%14.83%30.70%-10.80%

Correlation

The correlation between NACP and QARP is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2018

0.86

The correlation between NACP and QARP shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NACP vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NACP
QARP

Technology

39.9%
24.1%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
9.4%

Financial Services

10.0%
12.4%

Communication Services

8.8%
10.5%

Healthcare

8.8%
14.0%

Industrials

8.5%
7.9%

Energy

4.1%
6.3%

Utilities

3.1%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
9.5%

Basic Materials

1.3%
2.5%

Real Estate

1.2%
1.0%

Technology

NACP
39.9%
QARP
24.1%

Consumer Cyclical

NACP
11.3%
QARP
9.4%

Financial Services

NACP
10.0%
QARP
12.4%

Communication Services

NACP
8.8%
QARP
10.5%

Healthcare

NACP
8.8%
QARP
14.0%

Industrials

NACP
8.5%
QARP
7.9%

Energy

NACP
4.1%
QARP
6.3%

Utilities

NACP
3.1%
QARP
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

NACP
3.0%
QARP
9.5%

Basic Materials

NACP
1.3%
QARP
2.5%

Real Estate

NACP
1.2%
QARP
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NACP vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NACP
NACP Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
NACP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NACP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
NACP Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
NACP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
NACP Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

QARP
QARP Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
QARP Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
QARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QARP Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NACP vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NACPQARPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.46

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.11

3.71

+0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.83

16.59

-0.77

NACP vs. QARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NACP Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the QARP Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NACP and QARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NACP vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NACP drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, smaller than the maximum QARP drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NACP and QARP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NACPQARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.96%

-35.44%

+4.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.65%

-7.26%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.66%

-15.65%

-4.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.89%

-22.75%

-5.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

0.00%

-0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.68%

-4.37%

-1.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

1.62%

+0.88%

Volatility

NACP vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison

Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) at 2.79%. This indicates that NACP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NACPQARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.92%

2.79%

+3.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.60%

8.20%

+5.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.33%

10.70%

+5.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.87%

15.53%

+2.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.79%

19.51%

-0.72%

NACP vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

NACP has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

NACP vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison

NACP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than QARP's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
NACP
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF
0.55%0.62%2.96%1.28%3.48%3.06%1.48%1.22%0.71%
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
1.00%1.14%1.39%1.28%1.68%1.34%1.61%1.85%1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


NACP and QARP have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NACP has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to QARP (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NACP dropped -30.96% vs QARP's -35.44%.

On 5-year performance, NACP leads with 14.99% vs 12.12% for QARP. On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NACP has performed better with a 14.99% return vs 12.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for NACP.

QARP has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.55% for NACP.

NACP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QARP is Quality Factor. NACP tracks Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index, while QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Impact Shares and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for NACP and 0.19% for QARP.

QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NACP and QARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer