PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NACP vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NACP vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NACP achieves a 22.35% return, which is significantly higher than ITOT's 11.78% return.


NACP

1D
0.14%
1M
8.57%
YTD
22.35%
6M
21.44%
1Y
44.11%
3Y*
27.38%
5Y*
16.01%
10Y*

ITOT

1D
0.48%
1M
4.64%
YTD
11.78%
6M
11.52%
1Y
28.81%
3Y*
22.39%
5Y*
12.80%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NACP vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
NACP
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF
22.35%21.38%23.93%29.69%-23.05%27.62%26.00%30.74%-8.79%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
11.78%17.00%23.80%26.12%-19.47%25.68%20.71%30.67%-11.12%

Correlation

The correlation between NACP and ITOT is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2018

0.91

The correlation between NACP and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

NACP vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NACP
ITOT

Technology

35.8%
33.8%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
10.1%

Financial Services

10.6%
12.1%

Communication Services

9.8%
10.3%

Healthcare

9.2%
9.0%

Industrials

8.7%
9.5%

Energy

5.0%
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
4.7%

Utilities

3.4%
2.3%

Basic Materials

1.5%
2.1%

Real Estate

1.3%
2.4%

Technology

NACP
35.8%
ITOT
33.8%

Consumer Cyclical

NACP
11.1%
ITOT
10.1%

Financial Services

NACP
10.6%
ITOT
12.1%

Communication Services

NACP
9.8%
ITOT
10.3%

Healthcare

NACP
9.2%
ITOT
9.0%

Industrials

NACP
8.7%
ITOT
9.5%

Energy

NACP
5.0%
ITOT
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

NACP
3.6%
ITOT
4.7%

Utilities

NACP
3.4%
ITOT
2.3%

Basic Materials

NACP
1.5%
ITOT
2.1%

Real Estate

NACP
1.3%
ITOT
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NACP vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NACP
NACP Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
NACP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NACP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
NACP Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
NACP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
NACP Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NACP vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NACPITOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.43

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.59

3.25

+1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.18

14.92

+5.26

NACP vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NACP Sharpe Ratio is 3.16, which is higher than the ITOT Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NACP and ITOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NACPITOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.16

2.37

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.74

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

0.57

+0.36

Drawdowns

NACP vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NACP drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NACP and ITOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NACPITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.96%

-55.20%

+24.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.65%

-8.90%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.66%

-19.44%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.89%

-25.36%

-2.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.25%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.75%

-6.97%

+1.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

1.94%

+0.25%

Volatility

NACP vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) at 2.94%. This indicates that NACP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NACPITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

2.94%

+1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.13%

9.14%

+1.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.02%

12.19%

+1.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.47%

17.35%

+0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.69%

18.26%

+0.43%

NACP vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

NACP has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

NACP vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

NACP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than ITOT's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
0.97%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%
NACP
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF
0.55%0.62%2.96%1.28%3.48%3.06%1.48%1.22%0.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, NACP and ITOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NACP has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to ITOT (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NACP dropped -30.96% vs ITOT's -55.20%.

On 5-year performance, NACP leads with 16.01% vs 12.80% for ITOT. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NACP has performed better with a 16.01% return vs 12.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for NACP.

ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.55% for NACP.

NACP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ITOT is Large Cap Blend Equities. NACP tracks Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index, while ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Impact Shares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for NACP and 0.03% for ITOT.

NACP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NACP and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer