NACP vs. GQGU

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU).

NACP and GQGU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NACP is a passively managed fund by Impact Shares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index. It was launched on Jul 18, 2018. GQGU is an actively managed fund by GQG Partners. It was launched on Jul 14, 2025.

Performance

NACP vs. GQGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NACP vs. GQGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NACP Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF	-0.29%	12.54%
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF	8.19%	-1.14%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NACP achieves a -0.29% return, which is significantly lower than GQGU's 8.19% return.

NACP

• 1D: 1.33%
• 1M: -3.63%
• YTD: -0.29%
• 6M: 2.32%
• 1Y: 23.41%
• 3Y*: 20.96%
• 5Y*: 12.35%
• 10Y*: —

GQGU

• 1D: -1.30%
• 1M: -3.10%
• YTD: 8.19%
• 6M: 6.64%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NACP vs. GQGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NACP and GQGU have an expense ratio of 0.49%.

NACP

Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF

GQGU

GQG US Equity ETF

Return for Risk

NACP vs. GQGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NACP

NACP Risk / Return Rank: 68
NACP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
NACP Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
NACP Omega Ratio Rank: 67
NACP Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
NACP Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NACP vs. GQGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NACP	GQGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.91	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.24	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NACP	GQGU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.20	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	1.02	-0.23

Correlation

The correlation between NACP and GQGU is -0.06. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

NACP vs. GQGU - Dividend Comparison

NACP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than GQGU's 0.94% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
NACP Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF	0.67%	0.62%	2.96%	1.28%	3.48%	3.06%	1.48%	1.22%	0.71%
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF	0.94%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

NACP vs. GQGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NACP drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, which is greater than GQGU's maximum drawdown of -6.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NACP and GQGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	NACP	GQGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.96%	-6.65%	-24.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.50%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.76%	-3.24%	-2.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.86%	-2.21%	-3.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.90%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NACP	GQGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.08%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.21%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.60%	9.66%	+9.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.36%	9.66%	+7.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.76%	9.66%	+9.10%